Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Start with 3.
And ignore 2, it's a total waste of time and it barely fits in the story at all.
It will fill his dark soul with liiiiiigggghhhhhttttttt...
Yes, it should be fine for you in order to get into the story, but I want to clear out some comments above
Original timeline was:
Now, after DMC5 came out:
If you want not only get into the lore, but actually enjoy gameplay too, then it's better to
Have fun.
Edit: IMO the story is pretty worth it, it's quite entertaining, so get into it
1 then 3
My opinion on what's essential for the full enjoyment of 5 is: play 3 and 4. They're both absolutely worth it. You can play 1 if you want, but you can also just read about it and you're covered. As long as you know about Dante, Vergil, Trish and Mundus/Sparda, playing 1 is unnecessary. The game didn't age well in my opinion. Ignore 2 completely.
I replay it regularly, and it's aged well enough if you just expect it to be what it is. It's the starting point before the refinement that came with 3. The feeling and and excitement is there, it's just really rough around the edges.