Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There have been a number of really good relaunches of old games (with Baldur's Gate as the best example) and they all had one thing in common - tweaks to the resolution and the interface.
I loved PT, hope you guys will do a proper brushup of this.
Sorry for the circumstances!
Make a rematered version of the game and then maybe ...
The game needs fixes. Like errant boys, our criminal people don`t restore they health in the HQ, AI is really easy to beat, AI doesn`t expand their warehouses. THey don`t attack our restaurants...
Sorry but no, and no :)
Old 2D games at 640x480 scale badly even to 1024x768, let alone to 2k or more.
I'm also fairly certain that you can't force AA on old DOS games in 2D.
What this game needs is the devs giving it some TLC and redo the artwork plus improve the UI a bit. Play the remastered versions of the Baldur's Gate games and then go back to the old games to see just how much a difference that makes.
I let my monitor scale it to 2560x1440 at original ratio (black stripes left and right) and it looks okay. But every other screen I have seen scaling was awful the bigger the difference was. On my old Samsung 2494HS it would have looked that bad that i would have prefered to force it to run in a small window at original res of the panel, no matter if the monitor scaled it or the gfx card. The gfx card made it better, but awful enough... I'm still astonished how well the Asus Swift PG278Q does this work. Fortunently 1440 lines means exactly 3 times of 480 lines, but I also scaled stuff with not that even ratios, eg 1080p resolutions up to 1440p.
It's worth to test different settings, especially when the monitor usually does not scale good. I remember scaling 640x480 on the samsung which had 1080 lines: Samsung-Scaling=total crap, Nvidia-scaling: crap, but scaling to a resolution with 960 lines was the best, because every pixel was doubled and a small horizontal black stripe remained. This might be the solution for someone using a screen with 1920x1080.
In contrast - buy any Dell screen and it will look good straight out of the box. I also really enjoy the images that HP's newer mid-to-high range models produce.
Colors may be a bit off, but back then when I bought it I didn't even know that there could be a difference ^^