Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
It just adds an unnecessary complication to the game and doesn't enhance gameplay. For roleplay purposes, yes, it would be nice to have such a thing, but it should be optional and voluntary (requiring sign-in by both parties).
Edited to add: If you make an Adam appear for each Eve, you've just forced a player into the role of husband to another player. Far better to let that sort of thing emerge organically.
More mouths to feed isn't better. And males don't have titties, so not nearly as useful as you would think. Play the game.
I know who is who already after 3 days.
I know the fear you have of change.
This game is about change
The design we have now really lends itself to an interesting dynamic. I have found myself relieved to be a male one time (no more babies popping out at random and forcing me to try to raise them or abandon them). However once everyone around me disappeaered, I ended up alone, running through wilderness hoping to run into another player and eventually just giving up on life because I didn't see what the point of it all was! Fascinatting and insightful experience.
/devious /blush
Maybe Adam could work purely as a helping hand
The game was going to change, regardless. Jason has already said the game isn't complete. New technologies will change gameplay in the future as we discover new challenges to overcome.
Most veteran players aren't afraid of change... we welcome it. Just don't expect the game to change in the way you deem necessary, that's all.
Also, you aren't contributing anything to the discussion you started... just making assertions and vague pronouncements. Do you have something substantial to offer, or is it just that you think so highly of your opinion that you believe everyone should agree with it?
YOU are the one who asserted 'A female cannot have children without a male'. Therefore, YOU brought reproduction into the discussion. You cannot then dismiss it as irrelevant without admitting you're just trying to stir up controversy and not really interested in discussing the matter properly. Stop moving the goalposts and debate honestly, or give up your little attempt to stir up people's emotions about a game that you don't even own.
Ummm... no. If you insist that Eve needs an Adam to have babies, then *all* women in-game would need to have men around (i.e., male characters of at least 14 years) in order to have babies. It would be non-sensical to insist on a Adam for every Eve but then say, "Well, her daughters don't need a man around to have kids."
Either males are needed for reproduction, or they're not. If they are, it's going to doom even more budding civilizations, as now not only lack of girls will doom the family, so will lack of boys.
Let's not even get into the subject of incest... what happens if the only male around is part of your family, which is going to be quite often? (Yes, I know many people RP marrying their brothers/uncles/cousins, but that's just for fun.) You're forced to have 'their' child? I can foresee a lot of people being disturbed by that idea.
Yes, Eve runs can go more smoothly with help. However, a competent child goes a long way to fixing that lack, after the initial 3 minutes. Teach your children to be helpful. "Pick up the basket and follow me, girl. We have to go to camp." "Farm the berries until you're older, then find a job that needs to be done." "Go and be useful." (That last one is usually in a good-sized town...)
This isn't hate, it's debate. You brought up an idea, we're explaining why we don't think it's a good one. :)
Once again, you're forcing a player into a role they might not choose for themselves, because there are no npcs in the game. Would *you* want to be forced to be an Adam? Or would you suicide to try to get your own Eve spawn?
Just because you spawn as a young adult (14 years old), it doesn't mean that you are a competent player. Sure, you can pick things up, but so can a child of 3 1/2 minutes. It really doesn't take that long, and with decent temperature it's not even that draining. Put the kid on a good spot and do work nearby; come back on check on them every 20-30 seconds. Or if you're traveling/scouting, tell them to follow and say F at 2 bars (3 if more than 2 kids). Be ready to drop everything (literally) when they do say it, though!
Again: I don't see what value forced Adam spawns bring to the game. You'd be better off with a child, because at least they take less food than an adult. Breastfeeding a baby (or child of up to 5) takes 1 pip from your hunger meter, and nothing extra if you carry them. So feeding a baby 3 bars (to fill them up from 1) only costs you 1 pip, but an adult would need to eat a berry (or popcorn, if you have it) to make up that same food loss. In a tight food situation, an Adam will be a liability and most experienced players would suicide to allow the Eve (or her offspring) a better chance. With this proposal, you'll need at least 50% more wild food to be able to survive until the farms start producing, and it can be hard enough to find sometimes as it is.