Surviving survival... without playing. WHAT a joke!

[Mike]

So spammed disasters, how yo avoid hem best? Enter the game... collect the resources and exit before the next spam event happens.

Most important part at star.
Luck with the lunchboxes in the beginning, if your unlucky and get no good weapon, dwellers or medpacks in the first couple - GL!
Dont level the dwellers to fast
Dont level the rooms

Yeah sounds like a fun game "management" game right? - Where its more about luck with the first few lunchboxes and i believe the only game that's not beneficial "managing" it due to stayin in game will bring more disasters than not. What a joke - Really!

[Tetsuri]

maybe you just bad at game...

Your complaint is liek some guy used to playing on novice mode and then complaining that game isn't in easy mode when you put it on hardcore and you just keep losing your character. Oh, and let's let us use the same nub strategies we've been using on easy mode and whine when the game demands we actually try.

Oh, and you don't "NEED" to get lucky drops from lunchboxes, that's just other people not being able to handle playing survival without a boost

[Eden Beaver]

First dang this kid throwin' shade, and second yes the first lunchboxes can tilt the start in your favor but are not a necessity. It's more about planning instead of just saying I want to do this without anything getting in the way cause it's not going to work out like that.

[Mike]

I knew someone with the attiude of "omg im the best player around" would comment about this in that kiddie boost my ego fashion. Sure it's possible to handle it without the box luck if doing it right, still a single good drop can make a world of difference so by design its more of a luck of the draw in the start more than actual planning. An descent weapon at start and a stimpack or 2 makes a day and night difference, unluck with thoose 2 and a few of the worse disasters and it wont matter how well it's planned and executed, your simply screwed.

And by design its also beneficial to not be in the game due to the disaster spam and rather go in it and collect the resources when their done and exit before the next disaster happens at start and that my friend - Is fcked up, a game that benefits from not playing is designed wrong.

So lets do a summary of the 30+ hrs of survival.
1. The luck of the draw with boxes in the beginning makes a far bigger impact than from ok to flawless planning & well executed plan - Fcked up imo!
2. Not playing in the game is beneficial - Even more of a fck up.
3. The luck with the type of disasters that stikers also play a big role in the start, its possible to get some really nasty combos as well as "yawn was this survival, really?" type of ones. Its really a super wide span of RNG.

All in all imo - Too much by design emphasis on RNG than actual planning and i for one suspect its made that way due to lunchboxes etc is sold...

[Der Hexer]

"disaster spam" is only true when playing a "survival vault".
rad-scorpions doesn't show up until ~36 dwellers and deathclaws doesn't attack until ~35 dwellers.
https://en.reddit.com/r/foshelter/comments/51dv4y/minimum_population_for_incidents/

if the other incidents are too punishing for your vault then something is wrong with your vault layout or the way you're playing a survival vault.
sure, bad things can happen but we all have to deal with it.

for me, inciedents on survival mode are really annoying because of the frequency - i can't really manage the vault without having several of them.
for me, rad-scorpion inciedents on survival mode are really deadly if i don't take care of my lvl1 dwellers training their stats.

[Tetsuri]

Originally posted by Rantoc:

I knew someone with the attiude of "omg im the best player around" would comment about this in that kiddie boost my ego fashion.

et only sounds egotistic when the idiot on the opposing end has no idea hao to play and can't understand when the game is explained to them.

There's a way to play the game. "RNG" and "get good #$%^ makes the game easier" is for losers. Go try playing X-COM(a real game) and then come back.

Again, if you can't handle a game, keep playing on kiddie mode and stop whining.

[Cinex920]

its no big deal to handle survival mode

[76561198122752648]

kkkkk

[Mike]

Originally posted by packor:

There's a way to play the game. "RNG" and "get good #$%^ makes the game easier" is for losers. Go try playing X-COM(a real game) and then come back.

Again, if you can't handle a game, keep playing on kiddie mode and stop whining.

You mean the real Xcom's from the dos/amiga era (Mythos/Microprose) and not the wattered and eased down kiddistyle latest "xcom" that's too dumbed down so the younger players wouldn't rage quit in 5 mins? Beat the real xcoms several times over on highest diff without breaking much a sweat so can your attitude. Guess what, thoose games (terror from the deep included) placed more emphasis on player skill as there were no lunch boxes that could bring the best weapon in game at start if you got lucky sure the hit's were a rng lottery as was the famed terror missions. Its the insane range of RNG thats the issue with FoS and if you don't see that as an issue thats your view, i personally think a game should be emphasized more around player skill.

[Tetsuri]

Originally posted by Rantoc:

You mean the real Xcom's from the dos/amiga era (Mythos/Microprose) and not the wattered and eased down kiddistyle latest "xcom" that's too dumbed down so the younger players wouldn't rage quit in 5 mins? Beat the real xcoms several times over on highest diff without breaking much a sweat so can your attitude. Guess what, thoose games (terror from the deep included) placed more emphasis on player skill as there were no lunch boxes that could bring the best weapon in game at start if you got lucky sure the hit's were a rng lottery as was the famed terror missions. Its the insane range of RNG thats the issue with FoS and if you don't see that as an issue thats your view, i personally think a game should be emphasized more around player skill.

LOL?! The original X-COM and TftD were much easier than the new ones. All you had to do was learn the game, JUST LIKE THIS ONE. If you thought they were "difficult", it's obvious you're just a terribad gamer. K thx bye nub.

Oh, and the new X-COM's too easy, so that's wai you couldn't even beat the first one on ironman nor even finish the second one right? Player plz. Gj playing on easy mode on those games too, I hope you also brought your whine there.

I take that back,with you and your trashy 30-50 hours/game -> whining, you're not even a gamer.

[Mike]

Originally posted by packor:

Originally posted by Rantoc:

You mean the real Xcom's from the dos/amiga era (Mythos/Microprose) and not the wattered and eased down kiddistyle latest "xcom" that's too dumbed down so the younger players wouldn't rage quit in 5 mins? Beat the real xcoms several times over on highest diff without breaking much a sweat so can your attitude. Guess what, thoose games (terror from the deep included) placed more emphasis on player skill as there were no lunch boxes that could bring the best weapon in game at start if you got lucky sure the hit's were a rng lottery as was the famed terror missions. Its the insane range of RNG thats the issue with FoS and if you don't see that as an issue thats your view, i personally think a game should be emphasized more around player skill.

LOL?! The original X-COM and TftD were much easier than the new ones. All you had to do was learn the game, JUST LIKE THIS ONE. If you thought they were "difficult", it's obvious you're just a terribad gamer. K thx bye nub.

Oh, and the new X-COM's too easy, so that's wai you couldn't even beat the first one on ironman nor even finish the second one right? Player plz. Gj playing on easy mode on those games too, I hope you also brought your whine there.

I take that back,with you and your trashy 30-50 hours/game -> whining, you're not even a gamer.

Is clear by your offencive nature that you take gaming way to seriously and feel personally hurt whenever someone point issues out in a game you like, why the narrow mindedness?

As for the achis etc, perhaps you didn't know about offlinemode in steam?

[Battleseed]

Expecting a mobile port to work like a PC game. F'n whiner.

[Tetsuri]

Originally posted by Rantoc:

Is clear by your offencive nature that you take gaming way to seriously and feel personally hurt whenever someone point issues out in a game you like, why the narrow mindedness?

As for the achis etc, perhaps you didn't know about offlinemode in steam?

incorrect. I LIKE gaming, and I'm super casual; I barely even game anymore, I'm reduced to mostly idle and mobile games. I don't give a f about Fallout Shelter, it's easy. It's when trash whine about games because they can't play that I get mad. F-in disgraceful pretend gamers annoy me. I don't mind people being BAD, I hate it when said BAD starts pointing fingers at dev/game because they're too dumb to figure things out. Ya, that you, fool. Get good.

Btw, nice new private profile settings, LOL. Nyao you can look moar like a scrub.

[Mike]

Originally posted by packor:

Originally posted by Rantoc:

Is clear by your offencive nature that you take gaming way to seriously and feel personally hurt whenever someone point issues out in a game you like, why the narrow mindedness?

As for the achis etc, perhaps you didn't know about offlinemode in steam?

incorrect. I take gaming seriously, I don't give a f about Fallout Shelter, it's easy. In fact, I've already stopped playing it, because it got boring. It's when trash whine about games because they can't play that I get mad. Ya, that you, fool. Get good.

Thanks for the amusement, found the outburst's entertaining but their clearly going to far with even insults. As for gaming i'm sure gaming is taken very-very seriously with over 4k hrs spent in a single clicker game =P

Have a nice day! Peace :)

[Tetsuri]

Originally posted by Rantoc:

Originally posted by packor:

incorrect. I take gaming seriously, I don't give a f about Fallout Shelter, it's easy. In fact, I've already stopped playing it, because it got boring. It's when trash whine about games because they can't play that I get mad. Ya, that you, fool. Get good.

Thanks for the amusement, found the outburst's entertaining but their clearly going to far with even insults. As for gaming i'm sure gaming is taken very-very seriously with over 4k hrs spent in a single clicker game =P

Have a nice day! Peace :)

Gj replying to the wrong comment, bro. Not sure hao that's even possible for you to take 10 minutes to make a reply and failing to see the edit. Btw, you're the one that suggested I take gaming seriously, so... you're the one contradicting yourself. Rest assured, the amusement's all coming from your end. You actually know wat an idle game is? Shocked.

LOL, actually, you probably don't, if you don't even understand that the point is to IDLE. I guess that's to be expected from a moron.

Also, you realize that your lack of logic in your arguments and reliance on using petty insults doesn't halp your argument at all? That also nothing new in this forum tho.

[Sugar Show]

I used this method to rush 100 dwellers and unlock all rooms without food or water.