REALLY!? "ROCK, PAPER AND SCISSORS COMBAT"?! XD

[Tooten]

Real combat, like real life (you guys probably don't know what that is, I know) is rock, paper and scissors. You make a move, your enemy makes a move, whoever makes the wrong move ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ DIES. The game follows that, you guys who call it "repetitive" (while you sit there with, 3k hours on CSGO, World of Warcraft, League of Legends, Mount and Blade, Battlefield 1, and Chivalry: Medieval Oh ♥♥♥♥ Here Comes A Dude With A Small Knife A Shield And A Left Mouse Button) need to too take more than a 5 minute break from watching your anime porn and learn the in depth combat. The game is not perfect by no means, it's needs more maps, heroes (a different publisher) and no in game purchases (Also should have had a Greek faction with an Achilles hero, but that's neither here nor there), but one thing you should not rag on is the combat, it's the best combat since your Mom's big ass sat on the Egyptians. But no for real, it's great in depth combat, I haven't enjoy cutting people this much since the first time I played Mount and Blade (contradiction I know), but it's very in depth and enjoyable. People who are getting scared because of these stupid reviews, don't, it's pretty good if you're into swords, fighting or just a pretty damn good game in general.

[Powercrank]

its basically a poor mans fighting game. instead of high-mid-low its left-right-up, and instead of throws its guard breaks. its the bare bones basics of any standard fighting game simply translated into a 3rd person action game style.

the problem is, its just the bare bones basics. it doesnt have a huge roster of characters each with extremely unique mechanics and playstyles, nor the deeper/more advanced systems that make good fighting games good.

[Lurnaezel]

Plus, just like in fighting games, some of the characters can just spam away and win most fights [i'm looking at you Peacekeeper and your break that does more than half of a Kensei's HP].

[Joe, aka. The Man]

Originally posted by ThunderBeard:

its basically a poor mans fighting game. instead of high-mid-low its left-right-up, and instead of throws its guard breaks. its the bare bones basics of any standard fighting game simply translated into a 3rd person action game style.

the problem is, its just the bare bones basics. it doesnt have a huge roster of characters each with extremely unique mechanics and playstyles, nor the deeper/more advanced systems that make good fighting games good.

This. Even Chivalry is more advanced than this game, and gives you more freedom as to how to fight, and how to react immediately within seconds after you swing - you can even regret your swings!

Just like in real life fights. You know, the thing that you are totally into, and is a grand master at, in real life.

[JBM]

What a beautiful way to advocate for something...

[Tooten]

Originally posted by Doolio:

What a beautiful way to advocate for something...

Thank you

[Tooten]

LET THE FLAMEWARS BEGIN!

[Chozer]

ah alot of bronze people here

[Silent]

Originally posted by ACE - Tuck Footen Is Back:

LET THE FLAMEWARS BEGIN!

DEUS VULT!!!

[Vanrick]

i played chivarly long time ago , it was the most ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ i ever experienced, hardly enough realistic and even less playable or enjoyable , people spinning around while swinging (in that moment when i dude spinned 360º and killed me with the tazmanian attack i took a few step back and puked all over the floor), needless to say,people that complains about this game and uses "chivalry this chivalry THAT" comparison is as ignorant as they are about the depth of the combat system of this game.

[Joe, aka. The Man]

Originally posted by Gatsu:

i played chivarly long time ago , it was the most ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ i ever experienced, hardly enough realistic and even less playable or enjoyable , people spinning around while swinging (in that moment when i dude spinned 360º and killed me with the tazmanian attack i took a few step back and puked all over the floor), needless to say,people that complains about this game and uses "chivalry this chivalry THAT" comparison is as ignorant as they are about the depth of the combat system of this game.

I seriously shouldn't even try to correct you.

There is an very obvious reason, as to why Chivalry has such a better score, and this hasn't.

The majority has spoken, and you have become the ignorant being stuck in the "depth of the combat system".

Piss off, will you?

[Vanrick]

i cant believe you are defending that ♥♥♥♥♥♥ game ,that mess of a game. its like medieval warfare in the eyes of a 6 year old programmer with no knowledge about developing a game, your comment is as much of a joke as that incoherent game that you defend.

[Joe, aka. The Man]

Originally posted by Gatsu:

i cant believe you are defending that ♥♥♥♥♥♥ game ,that mess of a game. its like medieval warfare in the eyes of a 6 year old programmer with no knowledge about developing a game, your comment is as much of a joke as that incoherent game that you defend.

The playerbase of Chivalry has been stable since October, 2012... Are you retarded? Why would so many people play "Medieval Warfare in the eyes of a 6 year old programmer with no knowledge [...]"? - Even your sentence sounds quite unintelligent.

[Watakaze]

the moment when you are playing "ROCK, PAPER AND SCISSORS" and your opponent suddenly Punch at your face... ummm I mean guard break.

[Vanrick]

omg... 900 players online WTF IS THAT man ? how does 900 players around the world is a stable?
i wouldnt touch that game not even with 4k playerbase.. dead as harambe himself

[Joe, aka. The Man]

Originally posted by Watakaze:

the moment when you are playing "ROCK, PAPER AND SCISSORS" and your opponent suddenly Punch at your face... ummm I mean guard break.

Oh, you mean that button which stuns them for 2 hits, and you can't really block it? And it doesn't work if they are moving meanwhile?
Yeah, that is a very very cool, in-depth feature which changed the gameplay from ground-breaking to absolutely gangbangtastic!

Weabs often refrains from using their brains.