Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't understand why would Kokichi decide to kill Miu by using Gonta if he was so against murder :/ ? Surely he didn't have to go this far to convince the others he was the mastermind ?
And while the translation might not be entirely accurate, most of these points still come across well enough. So I don't see how they make him into a better character. If anything, they just make him look like a hypocrite.
1.Not entering the virtual world?
2.Telling the others what Miu has apparently planned? She's a weak person who's easily put down, so having her plans exposed could easily have discouraged her from trying to actually kill someone. Especially since that would make her far too suspicious after such a proclamation.
They could still have entered the virtual reality without her while someone like Kaito stood guard. They could even have tied her up first.
And Kokichi's motive video says he's the leader of a group that does nothing but petty, non-violent crimes. That's all you need to know to realize he's not a killer. Having his dislike spelled out directly just makes his actions worse.
This person outlined differences between translations in such detail. They should write a book.
Edit: Of course, since I don't know this person, it's entirely possible that they nitpicked facts and mistranslations to fit their idea of Ouma, and there were mistranslations into opposite direction they decided not to include. But I'll never know the truth.
Your first point would definitely have prevented Kokichi from being the murder victim, but Miu could've just as easily switched a few things in the simulation and chose anyone else as her victim. Given his apathy for murders, I doubt he'd see that as a worthwhile solution, nor would he be willing to take the risk.
As for the second point, from every character's perspective, Kokichi is a compulsive liar; he doesn't have the necessary credibility to expose someone like that. Plus, of course it would put Miu in hot waters had she actually carried out a murder after that, but that would've only applied after a murder had occurred; there would already be a victim at that point. and that's a no-no for him.
In my opinion, the fourth trial is where Kokichi was forced in a corner, and decided to try and save those he could no matter the sacrifices. He thought Miu's plan wasn't good because it'd either only save herself, or keep the killing game going, but he likely also thought that if he took things into his own hands, he'd be able to save more than a single person. I think that's why he went as far as he did, his priority was to save as many as he could, even if he himself couldn't be saved because of it. He probably weighed the importance of his moral versus the purpose that moral is meant to fulfill, and ultimately decided to try bringing down the killing game by any means necessary; which, if I'm correct, would be quite the irony, because it means his moral became his motive, and he followed Kaede's footsteps despite saying in the first trial that her intentions were ultimately what the mastermind wanted.
I can see why he thinks people would misunderstand Ouma because you have to read in-between the lines so much to find out what he's really like, and most people aren't really good at that, but for me, I understood Ouma's character completely. I knew what he was like and what he was trying to get at after his motives were revealed. I certainly think he is a nice character who was forced to make rash decisions to stop the killing game. Personally, reading between the lines should've been mandatory for Ouma anyway. You've spent 4 chapters with him, at that point in the game you should've realized what he lies about and what sounds somewhat truthful.
For me, I understood Ouma's character completely based off of the localization of his character, but I can definitely see why others might not. I would just say that the Japanese version put the facts out there, but the localization version made you think more to find the true self of Ouma.
And the part about him being non-violent but the game not stating it well, I'm pretty sure it was very obvious that he wasn't a violent person once you saw his motive video. The motive video says specifically that his group did, " harmless, funny pranks " on people. Anybody who read that and compared it to his actions in the killing game, and his final line revealed by Kaito could easily understand what Ouma was like.
I just think it was easy for me to understand him, but I have no idea if this applies to anybody else...