Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XM-25
exactly, but only the size of a bullet and automatically explodes right after penetration (as opposed to a round that explodes after a set distance like the airburst rifle does)
They actually existed for a while, they were called Gyrojet rounds but never gained popularity due to the expense, low accuracy, and smal range.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrojet
Basically conventional ammo does it's job fine. If the time comes where the average infantry man needs to routinely blow things up with nothing but his gun, we'll adapt.
Right now we're using pretty small rounds that travel at high velocities to kill people, aka your standard assault rifle. At least as far as "war" goes.
As for most fatalities that are gun related to the public, most of them are caused by small rounds, such as 9mm and below. Doesn't take much to kill someone, surprisingly.
Killing a space marine though? With back up organs, power armor, modified skeleton? Even if you ran up on the dude with a pistol, and he was naked, and you somehow managed to get a shot off, unless you shot him directly in the eye, and you got real lucky and it bounced around in his skull for a bit, you MIGHT be able to kill him. How many space marines do you know that walk around naked though? Or would let someone run up on them? You'd be dead as soon as your hand even went to your holster/pocket.
When we have heavily armored infantry as a standard, or we start genetic engineering super soldiers, then bolters will probably be invented as a stop gap. Or we'll end up switching to full metal high calibur rounds for everything. But, the normal guy isn't going to be carrying around a 50. cal assault rifle now is he? The recoil would tear him apart, let alone him trying to actually aim the thing. So guess who would be carrying those? Yeah not the "normal" humans.
Modern concrete piercing air bombs have rockets to help with penetrating the concrete of bunkers, to explode inside.
But of course that is practical for a naval gun, or a modern concrete piercing air bomb.
But bullets? You don't need that. In fact, a simple non armored bullet with a copper or lead head will do enough internal damage in any living thing to kill it straightforwardly.
The main problem is that the modern bullets are not made to kill, but to hurt. That is why they have an armored head.
Kill one guy, and only the flies will care about the corpse.
Wound one guy, and 4 others will bring him to the medic, you will need 3 more to take care of him, and when he goes back home mutilated, civilians will request the end of the war.
Tell that to the guy who designed the 5.56 which is designed to penetrate the body then tumble around destroying as much of your internal organs as possible.
Or the Soviets, who used explosive 7,62mm Rounds in WW2(very rare and only by Specialists like Snipers)
But the standard round for most guns today are not meant for killing, but for hurting.