Multiplayer?

[Vallodja11]

Sorry gays, do you have idea why is there no one hosting the games online... The list is empty.... :(

[Cahos Rahne Veloza]

Because no one actually cares for multiplayer.

[Aglardae]

If they implement Coop, I'm game.

[Cahos Rahne Veloza]

Originally posted by Aglardae:

If they implement Coop, I'm game.

Yeah you wish :P

Play CoD, Fortnite or PUBG multiplayer fanboy.

[Machin Ator]

Originally posted by Cahos Rahne Veloza:

Originally posted by Aglardae:

If they implement Coop, I'm game.

Yeah you wish :P

Play CoD, Fortnite or PUBG multiplayer fanboy.

huh? tactics games are fun with others, child.

note, the game has multiplayer, i assume skirmish modes only. too bad, BattleTech as well would be much improved with a coop campaign mode

[Eversor That Coming]

Originally posted by vallodja92:

Sorry gays, do you have idea why is there no one hosting the games online... The list is empty.... :(

Hehehe,

gays

[Shoelessbeats]

Originally posted by Cahos Rahne Veloza:

Originally posted by Aglardae:

If they implement Coop, I'm game.

Yeah you wish :P

Play CoD, Fortnite or PUBG multiplayer fanboy.

What an idiotic reply. Real edgy, mate.

[ANKH™]

Coop would have been awsome! (and more ingame options..like prone and such imo)

[Brigand231]

Asymmetrical play would have been wonderful too. 1-3 players playing agents like the vanilla game and one player running all the enemy units....

[Doggy]

Very true! The game is very great for multiplayer. And such stupid children they answer like "play cod" are the biggest idiots ever!!!!
Tactical/strategic games are not (very worse) mainstream-shooter.

And very right too: It will be make a lot of fun to play the game with real humans against another human-team.

Coop iks the biggest bullsh.. ever. Cant unserstan why all cry for coop (in other games too)! Perhaps they feel like a hero when they win against stupid bots.

Real humans will use other tactics,but the most kiddies wanted to play coop because their poor tactics will work there they never work against real humans.

And so good games dont have a good multiplayer or only 1vs1. We live in the year 2019 and it must be possible for a tactical game to play more as only 1vs1.

Close combat offers only 1vs1 toombut it will be make much more fun when you have a teammate you can coordinate your tactics,

But typical for the steamforum to become such stupid answers like "play cod" when ask for multiplayer.

Such kind of games with some soldiers and turn based will be so great for tactical team vs teammatches.
Other turn based games like CIV-serie,Hearts of Iron ect are much too big,matches playtime too long and for me much to boring.

I wait so long for a good turn based game with multiplayer it support more than only 2 player.

Battle Academy 2 is a good example for a very great gamee too but it havve only 1vs1 matches and will not played very often

But in this modern age most games are only big mainstreammess they realeased unfinished very soon and you can buy many dlc to "finish" such games.

Perhaps a good turn based game with a good multiplayer and support for more than 2 player will released sometimes.

Hate all the modern mainstreamess like PBG,COD,FORNITE or hectical actionmess like company of heroes they have only "stratefic/tactical" in the name,but gameplay is absolute rubbish.

[Vladislav4ik]

Hey! I would like to try PVP. I usually online after 7pm Ukraine (EEST) - we can also try something at weekend! Go ahead and add me If you like :)