Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I always assumed that Williams death and Max's moving to Seatlle both are close together in the timeline. It better explain Max's and Chloe's behaviour in BTS and LIS.
Regardless of any inconsistencies, I loved it.
The front of the house was partially painted in LiS and BtS and it's completely painted in the alternate timeline, since William was alive to finish it.
The back of the house was partially painted in LiS episode 1, but you never get a chance to see the backyard in the either the flashback timeline or in BtS to see how much progress had been made.
But really, the back of the house should be half painted in Farewell unless the devs are trying to imply that someone else tried to finish it at some point after William's death but gave up. Possibly Chloe?
So that's not definitely an inconsistency, but it is kind of fishy. It would have been simpler to just have the back of the house half painted in Farewell.
Now that I think about it, there's the email on William's computer suggesting that his brother is planning to come and help. I could see that perhaps he decides to still come and do it to try and help out Joyce in some way. So I think I'm OK with it (although I agree it would have been simpler just to have it in the same state as in LiS episode 1).
Hmm, good find. I'll have to read that email more closely when I replay Farewell later tonight, because that point definitely went over my head on my first playthrough. I'm not sure if I love or hate Deck Nine for creating "inconsistencies" and then hiding solutions to them in the game, but it definitely rewards your attention.
I agree with your comment in another thread that the way they've done it (especially with the clothes) works fairly well. I wouldn't want to have twigged straight away that William was going to die that day; having it dawn on you later ("I thought they'd be back by now...") works quite nicely.