Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
As helpful as if your office application would either ignore your save file button clicks or delete your file occasionally between random successful saves :)
Wrong or not totally true. You can damage target that is not visually in contact with your blade. This video at 4:23 clearly shows it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE3kPPN5PyI
The hitting order, determined by the sparks, is Mech, little tank and big tank. The Mech is never close to the blade and the blade is clearly swung few meters top of the little tank. Visually only the big tank is hit by the end of the swing.
Totally wrong. you can hit before the grey area. I have multiple footage (eg : the mecha samurai video) where I hit at point blank under the first circle.
I watched a replay where I was too close to an enemy mech and the handle of my axe passed through them but the blade did not and so it looked like I just clipped through them without hurting them.
In your second video I suspect the small tank and the mech just collided with your mech as you moved through them and that damaged them. The mech might be a heavier class but had parts destroyed which might have brought down its mass enough.
Yes, your theory (target must be in grey area) behind your method is wrong. But it doesn't mean your method doesn't let you have 100% hit.
The problem is since the theory is wrong, the method limit the player to a restrained use case. Ok, in a battle you hit 4 times in 4 attempts and have 100% success rate. But I'm pretty sure with a more risky approach you can hit 6 times in 10 attempt and have 60% success rate.
I'm not saying one is better than another. But I just want to make the player more aware.
Trying to close in and attempt risky multi hit... Risk and reward !