Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Apart from the release of the Benham and French line of destroyers, I really can't think of anything that has changed with regards to destroyers. There hasn't been any non-CV related DD buffs recently.
There will be an increase in DD's in game due to the release of the French line, but this happens every time a new line is released, give it a few weeks and they should return to normal levels. Then you will have a cruiser influx when the Italian line comes out, which will be good for BB's.
As I always say to players that say DD's are OP, pick a DD line and level it, past tier 4 you will soon find that DD's are far from overpowered and once they start meeting radars can actually be a very frustrating class to play.
Also, staying bow-on will either force them to take longer to hit you with a full salvo or force them to shoot a spread that isn't going to hit with everything. If you've got HE loaded, at that range, you can get a good number of hits and blow away large portions of their HP.
Not that I like getting stuck facing off against DDs alone, since at that point you're absolutely not going to be able to even spot a DD that doesn't make a major mistake, but that situation really shouldn't happen most of the time.
Also, my second most used ship is a DD that only has 8 km torp range (no, I don't have a choice for longer range torps with this particular ship). I sure as hell am not going to be charging anything down with that thing unless I've got an island between me and my target on the approach vector. Otherwise it's scouting and stealth torping all day every day. Well, on the days I actually take her out for a spin anyway.
you with the 10th set of torps he's fired that battle.... Reality ONE 14" shell basically destroyed the USS Roberts of Taffy 14 in WW2, and basically no destroyer carried reload torpedoes. So summation BB guns are basically ineffective against DD's due to accuracy and rate of fire, secondaries are a joke with range and accuracy that are laughable and most Battleships don't have radar (teir 6 and up ALL should have radar(well expect the ♥♥♥♥). Destroyers are able to take and survive a stupid amount of fire, have infinite torpedoes and are so stealthy they can just ripple fire torps OVER AND OVER from stealth. I believe that would be the definition of Over Powered and Unbalanced! Used to love this game it was fun, it's just not any more due to this and other balance issues.
Also, a DD is a direct counter to a BB, just like a BB is a direct counter to a cruiser and a cruiser is a direct counter to a DD. You need balance, whereas you are asking for BB's to dominate all classes, which would make for a very boring game for everyone except BB players. Just look at when the CV rework was first released. BB's are still the strongest class in game, they have the largest HP pools, heals and the ability to spec to mitigate damage. If you're having a problem with DD's either your team didn't screen enough for you, or you pushed when you shouldn't have.
It sounds like you only play BB's, expand your ships classes a bit more, play each class and you will understand each classes strengths and weaknesses and should realise that your claim is far from the truth.
Like Donegali has said, the classes have a rock-paper-scissors meta. BBs can overmatch cruiser armor, cruisers can radar DDs, and DDs can torp BBs. Save for CVs, it's quite balanced if not campy.
You seem to desire instant-gratifcation. In that case, this isn't the game for you, as it is a very long grind and takes thousands of battles to get to unicum level due to the difficulty of the game mechanics. Watching others play and reading guides will cut that learning time by 70%, but you could just stop playing the game altogether since you don't seem keen to learn from your mistakes.
Go complain on official wows forums and see how people react
As explained already, this game works on a paper, rock, scissors mechanic, each class has a counter. Setting up a battle between a class and it's direct counter gives no meaningful results without there being counters to the counter class. By only playing BB's you are limiting your knowledge of the game and lose a vast amount of knowledge of how to play against your counter class.
Also as explained before, this is an arcade game, not real life, so stop using real life examples, it has no relevance to WoWs whatsoever as it is not a realistic simulation.
As for your last sentence, I don't need to question my honesty as I look at the game with a broader perspective than you, not from the perspective of 1 class because I play ALL classes.
I do actually suggest doing this, there is a much broader spectrum of players on the main forums.
Original post If you actually want to learn read it and absorb it.
It is a team game, all the other classes matter, once you accept that you will quickly realise there isn't one OP unbalanced class.
Thought experiment:
What happens if you put 10 CCs against 10 DDs? The CCs will dominate them every time, Therefore CCs are OP and need to be nerfed.
What happens if you put 10 BBs against 10 CCs? The BBs will dominate them every time, therefore BBs are OP and need to be nerfed.
What happens if you put 10 Graf Zeppelins against 10 tier 8 carriers of any other type? The Graf Zeppelins will group up for an AA screen and cap/hold objectives with their superior secondaries while aircraft are shot down by the heavy AA provided by blobbing up. We can thus gather that Graf Zeppelin is the strongest carrier in the game because of her secondaries, despite all the non-dumb contrived scenario evidence suggesting otherwise.
Also,
This is a giant doubt from me. I'm a 55% win rate player (for now), and I definitely can't count the number of games where I've made a dumb mistake and had to get carried on just one hand (or even two!) in the last six months over the course of hundreds of matches.
This sounds like the claim of a player that's completely oblivious to the mistakes they're making and just chugging along without attempting to improve, instead just opting to blame the game rather than looking inward for improvement.
So OP, if you ever need advice and want to actually try to follow it — then forum users are very helpful. But if you think you know everything better than anyone else — sorry.