skill based matchmaker please + concede button

[Flashshark]

Well the matches are so completely onesided atm...
Its extremely booring to play this game!

Why are total Pros and Clanmembers matched against non clanmembers and noobs?

Seriously WG has all stats (K/D, avarage damage, max kills, max dmg) why is there no skill based matchmaking that delivers fascinating and exciting pairings?

They just match ships and thats it.... a cheap 5 minutes code!

I really would like to quit matches.
Maybe a conced button would be great that end a match if 66% of the team agrees to concede...

[Jackson]

You've been around long enough to know the answer. The answer is they wish to be random. They've plainly stated it many times. If you like battles with less randomness and more skill based, play Ranked or Clan Battles.

If everyone who didn't get their way was able to skip matches, we'd not have any. Very unworkable.

[Flashshark]

Well thats why I said IF 66% VOTE for concede....
So not 1 person descides it and noone could skip or leave battles!

Random battles are more booring, you win easyly or you loose hard.
More battles inbetween this two extreme sides would be awesome and fascinating!

I really think the game could massively win players from exciting fights...
Wins would feel like real wins and losses would be great fights anyways.

[sneakybass]

I just won five or six straight games In random I will post a pic why you complaining join a clan If you think Its unfair you will find out real soon, random battles are great for grinding ships I get 5000 to 7000 xp every game tier 9........concede button never going to happen . When you die use another ship Its that simple......

[Banzai]

Im sure we had this discussion about conceding before, and still dont agree with the idea. Personally i'll go down fighting on a loss, and frankly every unsunk person in the match would be earning less xp/silver if this became a thing. Plus, while it doesnt often happen its possible to swing what looks like a loss to a win at times, especially when the winning team gets overconfident. At the most extreme i've had a win on epicentre after my team was something like 300-950 down so its best to not give up.

[sneakybass]

Nguyên văn bởi Banzai:

Im sure we had this discussion about conceding before, and still dont agree with the idea. Personally i'll go down fighting on a loss, and frankly every unsunk person in the match would be earning less xp/silver if this became a thing. Plus, while it doesnt often happen its possible to swing what looks like a loss to a win at times, especially when the winning team gets overconfident. At the most extreme i've had a win on epicentre after my team was something like 300-950 down so its best to not give up.

Me too...........

[Superczar]

I find I have better games a lot of times in a loss, almost all my best games are from losses, LOFL.

[Shade]

Yea it won't happen because WG likes to cater to trash, its baffling how 1 game can contain so many.

[Banzai]

Nguyên văn bởi Shade:

Yea it won't happen because WG likes to cater to trash, its baffling how 1 game can contain so many.

Puzzled by this comment. How does this apply (assuming for a moment that its true) to what the OP was suggesting?

Was also reminded of a game from a couple of days ago when a Shima on our team pretty much suicides at the start and then declares to the rest of us that "game is lost". He then hung around in chat for the rest of the game telling us not to try since there was no chance of winning and we might as well give up. Why on earth should someone like that get to vote to concede the game on my behalf? For the record we lost, with me brawling 5 of the enemy team at the end of the match, but we took a few of them down in the process.

[sneakybass]

The only way i will concede Is over my dead body. Flash shark for 1,600 hours I would think you would know better,and what your asking would cause more trouble In game really...and besides that leaving a game early will upset people who try to win at all costs.

[Jackson]

Nguyên văn bởi Shade:

Yea it won't happen because WG likes to cater to trash, its baffling how 1 game can contain so many.

Hmm... I think more accurately WG caters to those with cash. Generally those with jobs who have less time and more money and are less likely to be elitist jerks. ;)

[Paco]

Hello guys. What I find very but really very ridiculous is the tiers matchmaking. How should I fight with a 6 level ship against a 8 level ship ??? And then I level up but my life isn't easier because at 7 level I'm supposed to fight and win against a level 9..... Wtf ?! This ruins the experience. Because if you play against a pro who has also a (premium) 8-10 level ship.... It becomes very very one sided and ridiculous fight...

[Jackson]

Nguyên văn bởi Paco:

Hello guys. What I find very but really very ridiculous is the tiers matchmaking. How should I fight with a 6 level ship against a 8 level ship ??? And then I level up but my life isn't easier because at 7 level I'm supposed to fight and win against a level 9..... Wtf ?! This ruins the experience. Because if you play against a pro who has also a (premium) 8-10 level ship.... It becomes very very one sided and ridiculous fight...

There's a variety of reasons. One is that it creates a changing and random battle. You don't have to fight an 8 just because there's 8's in battle. Be aware of where you are and choose where you go carefully. Also be aware if you do damage to higher tier ships you get more credits and xp. Plus, you aren't always down tier. Just as often as you're downtiered you're up. (Unless you're playing T9-10 of course :)) Plus it's easier on the matchmaker and requires less time sitting waiting for battle which almost no one wants.

[Flashshark]

Nguyên văn bởi You Die0244:

I just won five or six straight games In random

And are you not boored by the easy wins?
I am boored by those many wins, sometimes I even do not fire a single shot and I win...
Also a win can be bad matchmaking, maybe I didn't make that clear enough!
And your post just underligns my opinion...

Nguyên văn bởi You Die0244:

what your asking would cause more trouble In game really...

Ahm, again:
ONLY IF MULTIPLE PLAYERS (LIKE 66% OF A TEAM) CONCEDE THE MATCH SHOULD END.
And no leaving should be possible, I think I allready wrote that

[[:V] Dani :3]

Nguyên văn bởi Paco:

Hello guys. What I find very but really very ridiculous is the tiers matchmaking. How should I fight with a 6 level ship against a 8 level ship ??? And then I level up but my life isn't easier because at 7 level I'm supposed to fight and win against a level 9..... Wtf ?! This ruins the experience. Because if you play against a pro who has also a (premium) 8-10 level ship.... It becomes very very one sided and ridiculous fight...

The reason is quite simple: to drive you up the tiers and entice you to spend money. It's a deliberately bad and intentionally frustrating matchmaker.

[Banzai]

Nguyên văn bởi Flashshark:

Ahm, again:
ONLY IF MULTIPLE PLAYERS (LIKE 66% OF A TEAM) CONCEDE THE MATCH SHOULD END.
And no leaving should be possible, I think I allready wrote that

Theres enough people who just give up when a little behind on points or ships. As mentioned in my post above, why should the likes of them decide on my behalf to concede before the game is won or lost? Also I assume you are allowing the whole team to vote for the white flag which seems rather unfair on people who dont get sunk in the first few minutes of the match and actually try and make a fight of it.

Its not like the matches go on that long even without your suggested feature and again as mentioned, conceding would nerf the xp/silver income for everyone who was still playing, not to mention removing the possibility of turning the match around from a loss to a win late game.