安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Here's the list of T10 cruisers for NA
https://na.wows-numbers.com/ship/3655251408,Smolensk/
Henry IV, a techtree ship is better than Smolensk.
By using the menu you can look up any ship and see how it performs.
Oh shove off with that dumb reasoning ''people dont perform well in it so the ship isnt broken'' im willing to bet that the reason behind that underperformance is because half of the people cant properly play the ship and likely got it earlier than any other tier 10 tech tree ship they cant get.
Its a living hell to play against that ship if its competent, its even worse when some subhumans decide to make a squad of 3 of them, you might as well not bother playing the game and set fire to your own ship at that stage.
Its the same thing with the atlanta, half the people that get it dont know how to play it, other half that does makes the game the most unfun it can be.
I retain my original stance i had a year ago, ships like the atlanta, ships like the smolensk, have no place in this game, it makes the game awful to play, boring, and borderline infuriating when you have to constantly deal with passive island sitting wusses that think theyre oh so skilled HE spamming everyone without incurring any risk themselves.
That all doesn't take away from the fact that it's annoying, not broken. As I prefer T8-10 I've seen plenty and have plenty of experience with them.
jk
If you hit it that is. A good smolensk will dodge the crap out of those shells at that kind of range pretty often.