安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Though rounds shouldn’t ricochets shouldn’t happen to superstructure with battleship guns ever, because of overmatch, but the point is still there.
The range is the main reason I’ve been afraid to try the Des Moines class, even though I would like too. But if it adds more appreciation, it’s the best heavy cruiser ever built — the Des Moines and Salem are that in game too, if you consider that it’s the only heavy cruiser ever completed in the entirety of the game at tier 9 and 10, apart from the Alaska at tier 9. In at least that aspect, it can claim that it requires blueprint project designs and similar just to conceive of cruisers that can compare to the Des Moines class.
The only other cruiser that exists in the range is the light cruiser Worcester.
Also to add, it isn’t US ships exclusively that burn, they don’t burn any more than other nation (in fact Salem and US battleships are slightly better because of improved heals that heal 100% fire damage). While the 38mm deck armor of US BBs is decently HE-resistant to most 6” and 8” guns.
I can confirm, I’m usually the one with the lighter.
And ever since I saw a Salem duel, out-dpm and thus kill a Moskva, which is not considered a bad ship in the least, I will not underestimate that ship anymore.