Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
On Tier 7 BB's I'd probably go for the Duke of York due to high fire starting chance, having good armor protection atleast against AP, however if Cruisers don't get me, the vulnerability against HE can be somewhat ignored.
The Soviet Poltava would be slightly worse behind due to the bad citadel placement (but it seems to be better able to be angled and still being able to use all turrets in contrary to the Duke of York).
I always thought I'd leviate quasi naturally to German Battleships but they seem to be having problems with their guns atleast in the premium variant.
That would be okish, if the armor in return would be good alongside the citadel, but that doesn't seem to be the case for the Tirpitz and the same for the Tier 7 Scharnhorst.
Well there is probably a reason while the Royal Navy always was superior to the German one lol.
But maybe I'm on the lookout for the "Uber-BB", that just doesn't exist, dunno.
PS: Ashitaka on Tier 7 also doesn't seem like a bad choice too me, atleast according to what I can read on the Wiki. Plus it has this special camo, that also the Kii has, but overall is cheaper talking real world money.
So basically which tier fares better economically in general, speaking about Premium BB's, including regarding that you could get uptiered by two tiers. Tier 7 or Tier 8?
If I'd get a clear answer to that, if one is possible, I could atleast narrow it somewhat down and then make my choice.
I do not have any preference for tier 8, but I do very well creditwise, in the tier-7 Sharnhorst. Though that was with the previous matchmaking, where tier-7 was generally top-tier.
I don't have that much coal and won't get that much until 8th of April, never ever, except I get lucky with containers and then i need to be lucky multiple times :D
And in the shop this ship costs ~65€, a hefty price of cause (since it is Tier 9).
And is it really a moneymaker? It is tier 9 after all, so meaning higher service costs, even for premiums.
https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Economy#Operating_Cost
I mean, if I would Invest into a Jean Bart instead of one of the Tier 8 Ships, We talk about roughly 20 € more to pay.
Should I go this far, I want to be damn sure, that this is a solid, rewarding investment.
All I can give is my own experience... I do great in a JB, regulary 400k to 600k credits, my record stands at 864k. But it is variable and depends a lot on performance... I also have mediocre games, sub 300k.
Thats why I think a year premium time will, in the end, make you more credits... and will help you grind lines faster.
When I was short on credits: I had a tier-10 Conqueror. I bought the premium cammo (I think 5000 dubloons) and spend a month doing nothing but farming credits.
I think you might be over thinking this but!
The ship you enjoy playing the most will be the one you make the most credits on.
I just find I don't get upteired as often in tier 7, or if I do there are only one or two tier 9 ships. Therefore getting more battles I can contribute better in and in turn earn more money and exp.
After all, I guess we all grind the higher ships not only for looking at them sitting idle in the harbor, we wanna "take out the beasts" and not maybe like once in a week or so.
I remember this problem from back in WoT, where I managed to get a Tier 10 Heavy Soviet Tank and it ate up credits in maintenance.
Of cause back then (I don't know how it is today, maybe they changed it after all these years), there was no thing such as "flags" in WoWS to influence the credits earned and/or the maintenance cost after battle.
So back then I bought a Löwe Premium Heavy Tank, back then it was Tier 8 (if they haven't changed it it still is) and I never rued it, not only did it earn my credits reliably, it also was fun to play with it.
So I could in tandem play my Tier 10 Tank and afterwards, if I had bad luck, I just played a round with my Löwe and it was a net income after all, easy and that all without having bought premium. Since you can't get exactly the 24k doubloons but only 30k, you'd have to pay 100 € for a year premium.
I know I'm not going to constantly play all this time WoWS, at some point I'll jump into another game and play that for weeks, then maybe another and so on.
And after a year I'd have to pay again.
A Ship is a better investment imho, it stays as long as Wargaming exists and I doubt, that they have problems at all financially speaking, this game, along with it's brothers WoT and WoWP (and alongside the competition in form of Warthunder) is probably bound to stay and generate steady income just like other game classics.
And most importantly, I don't loose the economical advantage I've bought by not playing, I retain it.
According to wiki the Citadel of the Massachussetts is more exposed and it has a shorter range with the mainguns of only 18 km.
https://na.wows-numbers.com/ship/3751753712,Massachusetts/
Often things on paper don't come out how they would seem.
I got a coupon to save 25% on the doubloons cost of a premium ship up to Tier 8, so I purchased doubloons to get the Kii for only around 9K doubloons and purchased another, smaller load of dubloons to get more slots and the credit earner camo for it.
Wish me luck with that ship since solely by ship characteristics she wasn't my first choice, but well, we'll see ^^
I got the same feeling as with the Löwe back then in WoT, I don't rue the purchase :)