WHC or Zealot in Legend

[Rothgar57]

For people that play Legend would you rather have the Zealot or WHC as a team member and why?

I am starting to think that the WHC might be the overall stronger choice. I have just recently started playing WHC.

I was suprised how survivalbe the WHC was with Axe and Falchon increased dodge range/Barkskin or Boon of Shallya.

[Motrieg]

While whc can be better in terms of sustain, Zealot is superior in clutch situations. Also, there are sometimes different conditions for choosing one of them, such as some deed modifiers. As for me, both are welcomed in team. You can play anyone you're enjoying to play with. Just stay away from me with a drakegun please :P

[Brother Frank]

Everything is viable, just play what you personally prefer playing and you're fine. If you really want to be specific, WHC for competent teams because then you have 4 people actually tagging (the majority of people, despite being asked to tag do not tag) and then Zealot for everything else.

[Zegers]

They're both excellent. Zealot is far more braindead and you can pretty much just wade through everything with little care. WHC takes a bit more finese, but is also incredibly stong.

Basically, just play whichever one you have more fun with they're both far too strong for normal Legend.

[Halvars]

Originally posted by Brother Frank:

Everything is viable, just play what you personally prefer playing and you're fine. If you really want to be specific, WHC for competent teams because then you have 4 people actually tagging (the majority of people, despite being asked to tag do not tag) and then Zealot for everything else.

I just love how many WHC says to the others to tag but fails to do it himself...

Anyway I think it's a stupid mechanic, it should be a passive that applies to all elites/specials/monsters that are in a certain radius of WHC.