Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
GPU: None/Low/Medium/High CPU: None/Low/Medium/High
But a lot of other features like Skin Shade and High Quality Furr have no such things. Maybe it's because they're completely negligible? It's what I assumed but would love to know for sure.
High Quality Fur: What the name says—causes fur (eg, on Skaven) to look more realistic. It's difficult to measure the impact of this as battles are pretty frenetic, so I'd turn this off if you're looking to improve performance.
Skin Shading: Enables/disables advanced skin shading. Turning this off improves framerates by 1-2 percent.
I have both on personally. (All setting son Ultra.) I think the fur thing is more of a load on demand thing, and you won't notice the difference on rat's close up (they always use HQ fur) but rats further away swap to a more efficient model/texture or something.
Advanced skin shading might be self shadowing on enemies? Hard to tell.
Well, HQ Fur wouldn't exactly be a negligible hit to performance. If it really is what I think it is and it allows every hair follicule to move during battle...it's huge hit then.
But I DO NOT SEE AN IOTA OF DIFFERENCE! It doesn't even "reload" the screen like a lot of other options do. It just...yeah.
I've been looking at a very closeup shot of Markus' face with and without Adv.Skin Shade and, again, no difference.
Are these bugged and eating our resources for nothing? This could also apply to SS Reflections. I suspect they're bugged too.
Why would I even turn on the options that don't have any effect? Best example, SSR.
Screen Space Reflections: Turns on/off screen space reflections. This can make reflections on some surfaces, including water, look a bit better, but I rarely notice the difference when playing the game. Turning this off can improve performance by 5-8 percent, and I recommend doing so.
You wouldn't I assume?
Personally, I have extra horsepower to throw at it so there really is no reason to not have everything on.
If you don't, then don't?
Even if you did have, why have something that has no effect turned on? It's akin to letting your money go to waste just because you've got enough of it.
I simply want a clear irrefutable proof that these two work or an explanation of what is it that they should be doing.
edit: There doesn't seem to be any difference in HQF and Skaven in the distance.
Well if you get 60fps either way, why would you bother turning it off? I'm not sure how playing a game at Ultra settings is letting my money go to waste? By that logic am I letting my money go to waste if I play Minecraft? Since it doesn't need good hardware?
I mean, I thought I explained to you pretty well what they did?
Did you read the optimization guide I linked you? They tell you what it does and how much fps it costs you.
Have a screenshot comparing it?
I tried going off and on and they look the same. Unless I've been looking at wrong things.
Maybe it works only in DX 12?
I tried turning it on/off in game but if there is a difference it's subtle, at least close up. Possibly an increase in texture size for the fur? Or anti aliasing on the fur itself.
Well, maybe if I turn some meaningless options off, I can redirected their cost to much more meningful parts(AO, Sun Shadows for example).
I did read that and I agree with it. But! I have to witness it myself or it's not as real as if I just read it somewhere.