the real reason there isnt a 3rd game

[I STAPLE TAPEWORMS ON MY]

so like 1 was based on old movies and 2 was based on, at the time, modern movies. 3 would then be based on today's movies, but every movie now sucks so the game would suck. So uh, yeah, thats why there isnt a 3rd game.

[JI06CT3P]

Originally posted by Wenda:

so like 1 was based on old movies and 2 was based on, at the time, modern movies. 3 would then be based on today's movies, but every movie now sucks so the game would suck. So uh, yeah, thats why there isnt a 3rd game.

lol true
They even started to make movies vise versa based on l4d2

[geordiebroon58]

maybe that is also part of it but no

from a content standpoint what can you add that isnt just clutter? would more weappons really add to the gameplay experience apart from affecting balance and feeling nice to use something fresh for a while no soon enough people will meta te same weapons like ak47 and if nerfed whatever is good in the new arsanel

new survivors sure but like that isnt enough of a justified reason

new infected this would be similar to weapons except it may even just harm balance as you get less consitent infected combos

and if you go by half life logic then valve wont do something without a significent purpose behind it. they require solid motivations like showing off source 2 or in hl:a case their vr headset

l4d3 wouldnt offer inovative gameplay or an technical enhancment only way i see l4d3 releasing is to sow off enchanced machine learning AI in practice (imagine having bots mimicing real player behaviours) which i really doubt will happen especially anytime soon

[Santa Klaus]

Bro made a thread on an L4D2 discussion board just to have an excuse to whine about modern movies.

[supersand]

Originally posted by geordiebroon58:

maybe that is also part of it but no

from a content standpoint what can you add that isnt just clutter? would more weappons really add to the gameplay experience apart from affecting balance and feeling nice to use something fresh for a while no soon enough people will meta te same weapons like ak47 and if nerfed whatever is good in the new arsanel

new survivors sure but like that isnt enough of a justified reason

new infected this would be similar to weapons except it may even just harm balance as you get less consitent infected combos

and if you go by half life logic then valve wont do something without a significent purpose behind it. they require solid motivations like showing off source 2 or in hl:a case their vr headset

l4d3 wouldnt offer inovative gameplay or an technical enhancment only way i see l4d3 releasing is to sow off enchanced machine learning AI in practice (imagine having bots mimicing real player behaviours) which i really doubt will happen especially anytime soon

L4D3 was going to differentiate itself by being more open world without safe room loading screens between, more like BotW. The source engine just couldn't really handle it thou and they scrapped it until a new engine (thou at this point it might just be totally scrapped and the best we can hope for is a L4D2 remaster)

However I think L4D2 is a good formula and just adding more maps, infected, weapons, and QoL / Balance changes without bloating the pool would be fine for a L4D3.

[Franshish]

Originally posted by supersand:

Originally posted by geordiebroon58:

maybe that is also part of it but no

from a content standpoint what can you add that isnt just clutter? would more weappons really add to the gameplay experience apart from affecting balance and feeling nice to use something fresh for a while no soon enough people will meta te same weapons like ak47 and if nerfed whatever is good in the new arsanel

new survivors sure but like that isnt enough of a justified reason

new infected this would be similar to weapons except it may even just harm balance as you get less consitent infected combos

and if you go by half life logic then valve wont do something without a significent purpose behind it. they require solid motivations like showing off source 2 or in hl:a case their vr headset

l4d3 wouldnt offer inovative gameplay or an technical enhancment only way i see l4d3 releasing is to sow off enchanced machine learning AI in practice (imagine having bots mimicing real player behaviours) which i really doubt will happen especially anytime soon

L4D3 was going to differentiate itself by being more open world without safe room loading screens between, more like BotW. The source engine just couldn't really handle it thou and they scrapped it until a new engine (thou at this point it might just be totally scrapped and the best we can hope for is a L4D2 remaster)

However I think L4D2 is a good formula and just adding more maps, infected, weapons, and QoL / Balance changes without bloating the pool would be fine for a L4D3.

Left Four Ded 2 Remaster? Naah, We Need A 64-Bit Version

Also, We Had People Wanted L4D3 And Now A Guy Complaining About L4D2's Movie Type That's Pathetic

[JI06CT3P]

Originally posted by Franshish:

Originally posted by supersand:

L4D3 was going to differentiate itself by being more open world without safe room loading screens between, more like BotW. The source engine just couldn't really handle it thou and they scrapped it until a new engine (thou at this point it might just be totally scrapped and the best we can hope for is a L4D2 remaster)

However I think L4D2 is a good formula and just adding more maps, infected, weapons, and QoL / Balance changes without bloating the pool would be fine for a L4D3.

Left Four Ded 2 Remaster? Naah, We Need A 64-Bit Version

Also, We Had People Wanted L4D3 And Now A Guy Complaining About L4D2's Movie Type That's Pathetic

Yeah