If there isn't L4D3, there must Source 2 overhaul update with this one.

[gamz]

Similar to CS2 upgrade.

Please, vote.

[SNP]

Oh yes, Source 2 please.
Ruin the dark graphics and classic Source art style with fancy realism lighting. Ruin the game's perfectly fine performance because we all know putting CSGO on Source 2 went well.

The game needs more content, not a makeover...

[Psicohgts]

Yes, since the community will grow more and more players will be able to play the game and with better graphics

[SNP]

Originally posted by Lucho:

Yes, since the community will grow more and more players will be able to play the game and with better graphics

Half-Life had tons of community growth without needing to be ported into another engine.

The game needs more content, not a makeover.

[FATAL ERROR: cool sexy]

calling CS2 an upgrade could not be any further from the truth

[Lyica.]

Originally posted by Lucho:

Yes, since the community will grow more and more players will be able to play the game and with better graphics

You think it would grow more considering the sheer toxicness and griefing of this community? besides, why would you rework a game with tons of mods? You do realize if they updated the game to Source 2, all the mods wouldn't be usable anymore unless they update the mods to Source 2 and after that there will be less mods to use because some of modders already left years ago.

[linda420]

a strong no :( the graphics are great enough already. thanks!\
in my opinion, photorealism and immersion are for the simulators

be well! ;)

[missbe]

Originally posted by Dr. Snap, The Wizard:

Oh yes, Source 2 please.
Ruin the dark graphics and classic Source art style with fancy realism lighting. Ruin the game's perfectly fine performance because we all know putting CSGO on Source 2 went well. :emofdr:

The game needs more content, not a makeover...

have u even seen Half Life Alyx? its not engine's fault that cs2 is bright, the brightness was done in Hammer

[NB]

Originally posted by gamz:

Similar to CS2 upgrade.

Please, vote.

Ill be totally okay with them making l4d2 on source 2 as a separated game not making the same BS of replacing the game like they did with csgo to cs2.
as forced upgrade/update? , nah that would be horrible and probably will kill 90% of the workshop content and 50% of their low end pc playerbase.

[sara]

It be cool

[Bane]

@Dr. Snap, the Wizard I don't understand why realistic fancy lighting is always seen as negative. all it means is the fog effect won't look as crappy as it does right now. Maybe we could even get better bounce lighting and occlusion mapping which makes 2D textures look 3D, I don't know why that wasn't included in L4D2 even though it's possible in Source 1. i play with reshade atm because it makes the lighting look far better than in the base game

[Bane]

@NB, really? Most of these effects that we would like to see were possible as far back as 2006 and 2007, how can a computer even from 2011 or 2013 not be able to handle that?

[Souper]

Please don't replace a game that we've bought with money with something that suddenly has much higher system requirements for little benefit gameplay-wise..
Also, since it'd be more intensive, it'd end up performing worse. It'd probably just end up like the Source 2 equivalent of Half-Life: Source..

[♥ ノペゴウナ ♥ B)]

lol

[Sasha Pines (no brain)]

no look what they did to half life source and csgo they butcher it

[gamz]

Originally posted by Dr. Snap, The Wizard:

Oh yes, Source 2 please.
Ruin the dark graphics and classic Source art style with fancy realism lighting. Ruin the game's perfectly fine performance because we all know putting CSGO on Source 2 went well. :emofdr:

The game needs more content, not a makeover...

How do you know that S2 may ruin lightning and art style? Half-Life Alyx didn't look fancy to me.