Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
i only use AWP for the fun more than the damage or usefulness
There is a difference in DPS, that's true. But that doesn't matter, because it's a game. It doesn't matter if you win or lose. They have nothing to say about how you play.
is the flagship weapon of CS-GO,
this is a thing about snipers in general, all have super high piercing power and will destroy hordes with ease
so yet again sure the awp can kill multiple commons per short in a narrow area but every other sniper acheves the same thing
and the milla has 30 bullets and hunting gives good enough accuracy on the move anyways
However, by far the greatest flaw with both bolt actions is they are absolutely horrendous in taking down tanks. Assuming you can land every shot and not interrupted in any way, shape, or form the Scout takes around a minute in a half to drop a tank and a minute and twenty some odd seconds with the AWP against an Expert level tank.
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/left4dead/images/f/f3/Weapons_effectiveness_on_tank2.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20100609171648
In comparison the magnum, which is the third least effective in ranged weapon in dropping a tank in terms of dps sits pretty at about sixty seconds. Hunting and military rifle sit at 43 and 33 seconds respectively.
is it bad? absolutely
is it fun to use? only if your a masochist
will this get you kicked in the long run? most likely yes
Indeed but gives challenge to player using sniper, i'm sorry but Hunting or military are kinda overpowered and most people take those 2 weapons because it's easy to use and aim and oneshot.
The AWP doesn't do enough single shot damage to justify its insanely low DPS, and doesn't have enough DPS to justify its pretty low damage that can only really one shot Spitters and Boomers which the basic AK 47 and tier 1 shotguns can do.
If you made the AWP semi-auto and fire a shot every .3 seconds it would STILL do less DPS than the lower damage per shot Hunting Rifle and Military Sniper. Then not to even start with the Scout rifle? Damage per second is 100, meaning you can just BARELY one shot a Spitter.
If you just made these weapons fire 4 shots a second, they would be only SLIGHTLY better than the Hunting and Military Sniper rifle. It wouldn't break the game and people would use them. There is no reason at all to ever pick one of these guns and the CSS knife up, unlike the MP5 which has at least good damage per shot.
i never said otherwise, just saying in the sniper category the AWP is far behind the current 2.
i agree with you there