Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
The game obviously picks winners and losers. Given the original settlement placement, one can predict nearly unfailingly, which rolls will be the most often rolled; and nine of ten games, it won’t favor the human player. Or, if it’s an online game against other humans, the dice will unfailingly favor the lower-ranked players.
The rest of your post is the usual kind of unsubstantiated allegations.
Edit: Nope. I no longer believe that the Catan Universe RNG is fair.
6 only being rolled 3 times, on the other hand, is a one in 500.
one in 500 thousand odds combined are not a good public image for the developer. And if this stuff happens thousands of times, it's pretty likely that the game doesn't use a fair RNG.
Of course, there is no reason to trust a user's allegations either, especially in the absence of statistically significant evidence.