Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
At the same time, there are drawbacks. Our character becomes the polar opposite of the average new player. He knows everything about kindred society, while the new player knows nothing, and he understands little about the modern world, while the player does. The writing would have to carefully weave between obstacles this presents.
Speaking of lore, I really look forward to finding out WHY exactly we were in torpor. Was it an accident, against our will, or voluntary, part of a bigger plan? If so, what made us want to sleep for centuries?
Although, to be pedantic, I have not seen anywhere anything that says we actually were in torpor for hundreds of years. An elder, sure, but for all we know we could've gone to sleep in something like 1999 in anticipation of the millenium, or something like that, and were only out of the loop for a relatively short time.
I'm imagining what a 300 year Tremere would be like, waking up to find out all their secrets have been sold out and the clan is on the backfoot, let alone all the modern doo-hicky things that make no sense to someone from 1700.
Probably, but it would still be very, very interesting to roleplay an Elder who wakes up to find out his clan has lost its trump card that he or she held close to his or her chest for who knows how long and now has to put things back in order while knowing he or she is also a prime target for diablerie.
Nice! That's an excellent reason for voluntary torpor.
Yeah, but doesn't a lot of V20 lore do the same thing? As in, tie real-world history into vampire plots.
I fail to see the difference between 'trivializing' historical tragedies like various wars and crusades and inquisitions, and simply mentioning, in passing, that current and similarly terrible situations are also manipulated, exploited, or directed, by vampires.
I mean, the underlying point to all of it is that vampires are despicable, right? So it's not glamorizing or justifying horrible behavior when it's associated with the plots of inhuman, amoral vampire elders.
The only real difference is that so many people today on the internet are insanely whiny and stupid, while back when V20 did basically the same things, there wasn't a global platform for a minority of self-righteous losers to express exaggerated outrage.
A lot of V5 is dumbed down from V20. Some of it's unavoidable after essentially rebooting the timeline, while other elements had no reason to be diluted, yet still were.
I think getting rid of all the elders with a lazy plot device is lame for the simple reason that it restricts player choice. V20 gave us the option to be a weak (starting) vampire, or a strong (experienced) one. V5 only allows us to be weak or extremely weak.
Clearly, the new devs think that starting weak didn't fit their vision for the game. I'm cautiously optimistic, since starting as a fledgling gets really tiresome and predictable; not just in vampire games, but in all games.
It's possible they're keeping V5's setting, and our elder character is just special in being able to resist the Beckoning or whatever it's called.
This would make sense, because it'd make our character quite important and a highly desirable ally or kingmaker or outright leader material.
If the setting is more V20-like, then us being an elder isn't that special.
I'm talking specifically about Clan book lore.
The Lasombra, for instance, has a blurb about how much they love (or at least some of them do) embracing serial killers.
Now, just because they don't mention a specific real-life killer--does that change how inherently 'insensitive' the passage is to people who might be related to a victim of a serial killer?
Nope.
You could easily, if you wanted, argue that even the mere mention of serial killers being desirable for any reason, is either trivializing or glamorizing the act of serial killing.
Here's another example of a real-world reference, again from the Lasombra clan book: a blurb on submarines and how vampires use them, mentions a Kilo-class sub that was sold by Russia to Iran in '95.
That's superficially true and based on reality.
Going back much further, the historical references are constant. Pompey destroyed the Lasombra navy of his time. The Black Death in Europe, the Inquisition, the flu of 1919, etc.
The Tzimisce book mentions the Armenian genocide, and the Camarilla buying influence in the 'thoroughly corrupt Harding administration' in the early '20s.
This is just stuff I'm gleaning from a very quick skimming.
Actually, I would've preferred that you respond to the instances I mentioned of real world events being casually referenced in vampire lore.
But I mentioned serial killers because it's a repulsive topic that could easily 'trigger' people. You know, the same way they got triggered back in 2018, followed by the White Wolf team being cancelled.
Here's an excerpt of a statement by Paradox from around the time of the purge:
“In the Chechnya chapter of the V5 Camarilla book, we lost sight of this,” wrote Paradox’s vice president of business development, Shams Jorjani, in a statement. “The result was a chapter that dealt with a real-world, ongoing tragedy in a crude and disrespectful way. We should have identified this either during the creative process or in editing. This did not happen, and for this we apologize.”
Okay, now here's an excerpt from the Ventrue Clan book:
"In Germany, matters were more complicated. Many Ventrue had strong antipathy toward the Nazi party, chiefly because of its professed “socialist” and “populist” roots. Too many aspects of Hitler’s program reminded the old Ventrue of the Inquisition. Coupled with Hitler’s known interest in the occult, the elders saw a very real danger in a populist movement steeped in mysticism. If the Nazi party could believe Jews were responsible for all their evils, would it be such a step for them to believe that vampires had a role as well?"
"The younger Ventrue felt no such fear. They saw in Hitler what the Italian Ventrue saw in Mussolini: a new hope. The Nazis could restore order, rebuild the industries and armies, and keep the population in line. As it turned out, influencing Hitler was nigh impossible,
chiefly because he was so well guarded and so paranoid of paranormal manipulation that no Kindred could get to him. Although many Ventrue benefited from and had local influence within the Nazi party, few had any say in its direction."
I'm not going to split hairs on the finer points of whether certain vampires personally directed certain war crimes and the like. What's important is that the Ventrue are mentioned as being enmeshed to some degree within the Nazi party.
Yet the modern thin-skinned cretins on the internet went nuts simply by the slightest mention of Brujah embracing neo-Nazis.
While the same modern thin-skinned cretins would use this as evidence that White Wolf was always pro-Nazi, I'm saying that recounting how some vampires became Nazis does not espouse Nazism any more than recounting how some vampires embrace serial killers is a ringing endorsement of serial murder.
Only a hyper-sensitive moron looking for things to complain about would try to connect those dots.
The fact that White Wolf could 'get away' with what they did in the 90s, while approximately 20 years later the same style of world-building got them cancelled, should tell us how rapidly and completely the thin-skinned idiots have taken over.
All irrational swings of the pendulum must eventually average out, but I think we're still stuck in this idiot-rules cycle for at least another decade.
This is happening all over the place. Less than five years ago people were saying Disney was too big to fail and look at them now, scrambling, being forced to pay more money they actually have on hand to buy a third of Hulu and the stock dropping signficantly off a cliff so Bob Iger has to go "It's time to quiet the noise in the culture war". They also fired their DEI director, the CFO and multiple other executives.
WotC had to back down when they tried doing the OGL changes and Unity followed the exact same pattern just this past two weeks.
Apple, Xbox and other big corporations didn't even get past a week in June before removing the rainbow colors in their websites and their advertising when they saw what was going on with Target and Bud Light.
Simple fact is this, this course has run and the money has dried up so the corporations will find another well to try dig money out of, with a few holdouts hoping for the last few drops of water in the current well.