Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Hopefully the new devs are more open to what the players actually want.
It looked a lot like a vocal minority.
Games are always worse when they include both first and third person options.
Sometimes less is more.
I agree. Bloodlines 1 controlled like ♥♥♥♥ even when patched up. Having two perspectives was next to worthless.
The only reason they won't make third person is lack of effort. The rest is handwaves.
Lol TES and Fallout have both first and third person mode, and there's literally nothing "worse". Third person option should be mandatory in every rpg.
Even BG3 has a mod of people that want to play it like the witcher 3 (3rd person)
Lol, TES and Fallout are both series who got only worse with every new entry. TES3 was the last good TES game (I regret all my time spent in Oblivion and Skyrim by now) and as far as Fallout is concerned, Bethesda never understood that franchise in the first place. There is even a video about that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8U4k2Ik6yk
True though, both have first and third person options but there is so little depth to these games that it does not make a difference anymore anyway.
Bloodlines is like wine and salmon and avocado.
Skyrim is like pizza.