Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Chicago by Night has several fat vampires. Al Capone isn't exactly slim and Horatio Ballard is actively obese.
And canon at least is that vampires stay the same as at the time of their embrace. (Which sucks if they haven't shaved for a few days).
Vampirism - The ultimate weight loss solution!
https://whitewolf.fandom.com/wiki/Ambrosio_Luis_Mon%C3%A7adaç
So is Antoine https://whitewolf.fandom.com/wiki/Antoine
There is also a obese ventrue bloodline in requiem lol https://whitewolf.fandom.com/wiki/Macellarius
I think this makes the most sense, at least from a pseudo-science perspective. I mean, it seems like the vampiric body, being predatory by nature, would become more efficient in order to accomplish its only goal. And part of efficiency is eliminating waste material.
I can see why other types of lore might diverge from this logic, but to me this would be more fitting. This isn't a perfect analogy, but it's akin to why you don't see fat lions.
Do fat vampires exist?
Well, their existence is at the very least as plausible as any vampire existing at all.
https://whitewolf.fandom.com/wiki/Horatio_Ballard
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/whitewolf/images/d/d7/Horatio_Ballard.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20180523002012
Horatio Ballard of clan Ventrue, child of Lodin (former Prince of Chicago)
Well, there is a difference between saying they can exist in tiny numbers (in the lore); and saying they're as common as they should be, based on current trends in society.
I understand that any game master can make up certain rules, or point to anecdotes to justify them; but if, in practice, you very, very rarely see fat vampires, then they might as well not exist in terms of pop-culture perception.
Did the original have female fat vampires? No. Because the devs knew that's not what the majority of gamers wanted.
They knew what people wanted were sexy/seductive female vampires like Jeanette, or Ming Xiao. And those kind of characters are the reason WHY the original became a cult classic.
But nowadays it's somehow become a crime to be a straight male and want sexy/feminine characters in games (I.e. things that are perfectly normal and natural for a straight male to want).
Now we have to pretend we think overweight/masculine females are just as attractive, even though we don't...
Want proof we don't think that? Just look at any adult video site and see which video's are getting the most views...
It's a case of reality Vs social conditioning.
No, it hasn't became a crime to be that. Stop drinking from the conservative kool-aid.
I'm going to attempt to see both sides of the argument, and thereby satisfy no one but myself.
I do agree that the writing and characters meant more than the 90s-era basketball-sized silicone sacs in Bloodlines 1.
That being said, I also believe in the right of the not-insubstantial player base who want to see big knockers on otherwise thin women, to see said knockers in the games they play.
Regardless of my preferences (I'm not into adult-film standards), I empathize with my fellow men who are. And I would bet quite a substantial sum of money, that absolutely no NPCs in Bloodlines 2 will look like Heather. That is to say, a 14-year old boy's wet dream. That might sound dismissive to describe it as such, but I'm just making light of things.
Is the kind of sexiness depicted in Bloodlines 2 vitally important to the game's overall quality? No. But by the same token, the question begs to be asked: if it's not important, why was it deemed necessary to change it? It must be important to someone.