Does this game run worse then normal Arma 3 or?

[Sharky]

The title says it all

[Johnnie Concrete]

Same. I have uninstalled it. Bye.

[Bref]

Don't know why exactly, but it seems to be running bit better.

[Kobi Blade]

ArmA 3 (1080p High Settings): 45~60FPS
Project Argo (1080p Standard Settings): 24FPS

[onedigita aka roy]

you guys must be out to lunch or runing a really ♥♥♥♥♥♥ system

[Gubernaut]

With 10 players max I hope it runs a little better

[Reki]

I get better FPS, care to post Specs?
Max/ultra everything at 50-60

CPU: i7 3770(non k)
GPU: R9 390
OS: Windows 10 64-bit
Driver Version: 16.10.2

[killzz]

worse fps for me.
Pro. Argo = Standard settings at 25-40fps
Arma 3 = Very High/High settings at 45-60 fps

CPU: i5 4460 3.2 Ghz
GPU: GTX 750ti 2gb ddr5
OS: Windows 10 64-bit

[Kobi Blade]

Originally posted by Reki:

I get better FPS, care to post Specs?
Max/ultra everything at 50-60

CPU: i7 3770(non k)
GPU: R9 390
OS: Windows 10 64-bit
Driver Version: 16.10.2

Intel i5 6600K
AMD R9 380X
W10 x64
16.9.2

I get 60FPS on Arma III (1080p High Settings) and 24~30FPS on this game (no matter the settings).

[Zlokob]

worse for me, but not much. in fact, it runs like koth mode in arma3 for me, which is by far the worst performance mode in arma. in arma3 mp, like exile etc i get 45-60fps all the time. here, 30-50.

[Gubernaut]

Constant red chains

[Fractal]

Works better, is set on Malden which has less resources to load

[NvK_X91]

Can't even hit 40 FPS in an EMPTY server @ 1080p low settings.. can't even imagine what the FPS would be like in an active server..

R9 390

FX 8350

8GB Ram

[RannyQc]

Im about 45-50 fps with ultra setting but shadow high and without antialiasing.
i7 2600k
gtx 980

[ahpois]

i7 6700k and a gtx 1080 max settings 70-90 fps

[Reki]

Originally posted by Emton:

Constant red chains

That's essentially ArmA in a nutshell, they honestly don't mean ♥♥♥♥. If you drop literally a single packet it starts flashing red or yellow chains.