Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I remember there was the same issuse back with colonizing Argentina Southern Islands where it was also impassable and it was even at coast and you couldnt colonize it.
Yet if you play as USA there is no issue when you colonize imppasable terrain of Alaska.
You need to border whatever section of the state that is not colonized AND passable.
^
See it for yourself
African Sahara is an excellent example of impassible terrain not being colonizable. If you border a colonizable section of the state. You can colonize. Otherwise you cannot.
In other areas, like Alaska and African Sahara, the impassible sections get filled in. It is not happening here. This isn't an issue like the area around Chad where you can't reach it because of an impassible section, but the entire decentralized state being impassible. I believe this is caused by the randomness of which chunks are colonized and the fact that multiple decentralized nations exist in that state for some reason.