Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
2. At some point, meeting this level of expectations on a laborer's wage will become impossible. You can prolong it with universal healthcare and wage subsidies, but it won't last long, and subsidies are expensive.
Therefore, you have to do three things:
1. Make the consumption goods less expensive. Wall off your market with tariffs if necessary.
2. Give the people better, higher-paying jobs.
3. Avoid negative modifiers. For example, a head of state with the "cruel" trait will give a permanent -1 to SoL as long as they're in office.
Of course, it is possible to lower the "expected SoL" treshold by intentionally keeping the literacy low, and by not researching certain techs, but this is not recommended.
1. This is a highly inefficient usage of your workforce.
2. The peasants don't contribute much to the economy (consumption reduced by 90%)
3. Their SoL is capped at a very low level.
4. The aristocrats/landowners leeching off of their labor are a major political roadblock.
Even promoting the peasants to laborers will be a significant upgrade.