Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also we don´t know what release version actually have and what will be in the DLCs...
EU5 will run fine if you have 7800X3D or something faster like 9800x3D!
Or a supercomputer.
Let me foretell why it won't be easy on your PCs: the ballooning number of provinces, counties, districts call them what you will, plus the usual Paradox nonsense about visual depiction on the map => a grind to a halt by the end of the Middle Ages.
The production process and buildings in Vic 3 haven't been fixed yet and we are expected to buy the argument that the ones in EU5 will be better?
It's pretty funny to me that anybody would have high hopes for optimization and decent performance from Paradox when that isn't the case for a single one of their games, except maybe Imperator: Rome oddly enough. That game doesn't suffer from system bloat though either, hence why it's so boring lol
The companies they hire are not very good at efficient coding, so I guarantee there is no way the game will run "smoothly".