Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In my america campaign, by about 1866 Hudson Bay Company had finished settling Alberta - was wanting to do a Canada play through too so was goona do a benchmark here to play later kind of thing.
For some reason HBC's presence across majority of Canada wasn't firing the status of a british minor fully controlling the provinces, so I basically kept switching between the minors of Columbia District / HBC / Upper Canada and giving states to upper canada, which was actually firing the status update that a minor was in control of the provinces.
When I'd given them the 9 required, I just switched back to USA and kept my game going, and canada confederated (New Brunswick was it's own minor too but was eventually absorbed via later event I assume).
I saved in 1866 again when the AI had confederated Canada for my later benchmark, but I wonder if letting AI do the confederation spared them the AI confusion of needing to reduce autonomy/annexing you? Canada seemed to be working the brief bit i checked it out by doing it this way at least, not sure if it'd actually work for you or if i just got lucky though.
edit: Could a distribution of power / etc law difference be causing the annexation?