Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
1. The AI will never try to reunite split states, and there's not even a CB for this.
2. The AI won't attempt to reconquer provinces which are homelands to its people (except for events). This should've been a mechanic unlocked with Pan-Nationalism.
3. The AI is very passive in general, even if it has a military advantage.
4. On the other hand, since the game mechanics favor the defenders disproportionally, offensive wars are very risky. Even a mid-game war can devolve into a WW1-type meat grinder, and the AI is far too quick to give up. Probably because the war costs are badly balanced, since there's no war material stockpiling (unlike in RL).
What is with the condition the ai has to form germany?
In an extreme situation i had a worldwar between russia, austria and england on one side and france, prussia, usa and spain on the other side for Krakau integration of austria. Even if i have interests here. No leader, no player would ever fought such a war.
I once had France trying to intervene in my war to annex a tiny piece of Indochina. Despite them having good relations with me, and regardless of the fact that I was supplying half their steel.