is this better than civ6?

[DonPablo]

?

[Lost Latios]

Uh...well it depends on what you liked about Civ 6.

[rheniummm]

Completely different takes on strategy games

[shiggies713]

2 different types of games, but yea i like it better.

[Supply Slut]

That’s like asking if a hot dog is better than a mango. They are wildly different beasts.

[Scheneighnay]

Well, considering last I checked civ 6 still crashes constantly on every platform (including consoles) and the devs still actively deny that the issue exists, I would say yes, it's better than civ 6.

Like, they aren't just ignoring it, they came out and said that it's a user issue and everyone who says otherwise is lying. Despite even consoles having it.

[The Gray Fox]

Originally posted by Scheneighnay:

Well, considering last I checked civ 6 still crashes constantly on every platform (including consoles) and the devs still actively deny that the issue exists, I would say yes, it's better than civ 6.

Like, they aren't just ignoring it, they came out and said that it's a user issue and everyone who says otherwise is lying. Despite even consoles having it.

Never had a crash in Civ 6 on PC and I've owned the game since launch

Also Civ 6 is a better game than Vicky 3 imo but its Ai is terrible. I'd say just play Civ 5 with mods. Vicky 3 needs way more time in the oven and some dlc/patches

[shiggies713]

Originally posted by The Gray Fox:

Never had a crash in Civ 6 on PC and I've owned the game since launch

Also Civ 6 is a better game than Vicky 3 imo but its Ai is terrible. I'd say just play Civ 5 with mods. Vicky 3 needs way more time in the oven and some dlc/patches

Same, no crashes on civ6, but i actually have had them on vic3. AI is atrocious in civ6, comical even. It is trivial to play on deity difficulty, i can win easily on the highest levels because of 1 unit per tile rules and dumb ai. So overall, like i said originally i enjoy this more.

[All talk and no fight]

you should be comparing this to civ 5, since civ 6 is worse then civ 5

[Onlyones]

Difference, Civ6 focuses on city building and features, but Victoria 3 focuses on history and economics. I played both and I love both of them.

But if I must compare these two games, Civ6 is better because it has had a lot of time to develop new features. It's like a full version game.
Victoria 3 has a great concept, but it's like an unfinished game. It will take some time to fully develop this game.

[MP]

Is a tractor better than a lorry?

[Rialm]

Not quite the same game. A turn based vs a grand strategy game. It's quite a change in your life when you jump to grand strategy games!

[Inquerion]

Originally posted by MP:

Is a tractor better than a lorry?

Is a dog better than a cat?

[zorkman]

Anything is better than Civ 6. In fact as the above poster said, if you want a Civ game , get Civ5.

[Oubley]

So I haven't played as a power, tried as a middling nation... Honestly not sure how people can consider Victoria 3 is even a game. It wasn't really doing economics, and the population management from prior versions also seemed absent.

Ya, numbers were doing stuff, but it wasn't anything resembling economics.

A lot of the functions had auto decline/accept in x days, there was even an "observe" that was 100% more obvious then there other games. And to be honest, that's what it felt like, it wasn't an interactive game as much as you're looking at a painting or an advertisement board that changed.

I feel robbed honestly. Vic3 isn't even a start of a game. I mean, I guess you can call it a "start", cause it's a shell of something; but if I was the boss, would have said that's nice, now go make it do something.

And given paradox recent history, I think it might have to be my last with them.

I haven't played civ 6, but I can't see how it possibly could be worse then vic 3, particularly since it is a civ game. Though I have heard bad things about the civ companies data sharing etc.