Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That happens in real life, to be fair. Capitalists are just rich people. Not necessarily smart people, after all.
we see plenty of bad business transactions - blue bird anyone?
Victoria 2 is a "masterpiece" and Victoria 3 is "hot garbage" /S
There were certain circumstances where it was unironically enjoyable, when your tech maxed out and all build slots were filled nobody wants to button mash the upgrade buttons. Since, when your industry hit a certain size you were no longer making any real choices there, and the geopolitics was all that is left.
Unironically a lot of what made vicky 2 good was how things that would be totally PITA to micro had a tendency to fully automated themselves with the exception of your armies.
Obv. There were some quirks to this.
Mind you, interventionism was the real late game king because capitalists would auto-upgrade profitable buildings and you could subsidize vital to the state buildings.
Interventionism gave you the power to prevent industries from failing in 2, to close factories, and the ability to act as an investor on industrial projects, but you couldn't start a build on your own.
All vicky 3 economic laws are state capitalism in some form.
Like someone else noted, that stuff happens in the real world, too. There's a bunch of avocados getting dumped into the ocean in New Zealand and Thailand because investors read an article about how Millenials spend too much of their paychecks on avocados lmao
I prefer having the different economic set-ups provide buffs/penalties rather than take away levels of control from the player. This is an area that I do admit, Vic 3 does better in... no more 'huh, thanks for this useless steel mill in an economy with no raw iron to use it' nonsense from Vic 2 days as the CPU decided that that was the best capitalist decision there. You know, to make a steel mill for me when I don't have a need or use for it.
The quote below is basically why Vic 2's different econ types was a problem. Because yes, it played the game itself for you with, say, something like Laissez Faire, but it did it chaotically and poorly for the most part.
For real, tho. They go from telling me this:
https://www.9news.com.au/national/melbourne-property-tycoon-hammers-millennials-over-spending-habits/f1e61616-94c2-4fa4-aa07-49a33f7bf842
To this:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2022-07-26/farmers-beg-aussies-to-eat-avocado-avolanche/101268396
They better make up their minds, cuz I got ♥♥♥♥ to do