Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The more you tax the more revenue your government gets, allowing it to spend on costs for construction, military goods, administrative buildings, universities, etc.
The proportional taxation + the other one (not including consumption tax because thats basically no tax) tend to tax based more on wealth, which is great if your pops are wealthy but not so great if they're poor. If you were somehow able to implement the bottom two tax options as Qing at the start then you would take big losses for example, as they have a mostly peasant population.
consumption taxes can be good but they cost authority. In general I try not to go crazy on taxes. As a military junta my interest groups really didn't want to change the type of tax too much
Yeah realised that didn't explain a lot after posting lmaooo
added onto it a bit
I also like to target luxury goods like luxury clothes and furniture for my consumption taxes because they cost little authority for good returns and they only hurt the richest pops, who will stop buying them in the worst case, but still be at least comfortable in terms of their living standards.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Pancakes, thanks! The issue was that there were too many opposing factions. The support was in the negative. Thank you!