Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I would hope it's easier to pick up than Victoria 2 lol. Isn't victoria 2 the hardest game to play out of all of pdx games.
I'm expecting and hoping it is a little harder to play than ck 3, since the depth of the system of victoria 2 seemed very deep and I would love to see those translated to the new game.
Think of as a More advanced version of Hearts of Iron 4 with Colonization and the Build up to the First World War.
does victoria include ww1 or does it stop before the war?
One would say the jump from V2 to V3 is more dramatic than for CK2 to CK3 honestly, given how wildly unwelcoming V2 is.
isn't V2 widely agreed upon to be the most difficult to play "modern" pdx game?
How Vic 2 stacks against their modern games though? I don't think so. EU4, CK3 and HOI4 were all more sophisticated on launch. But, even if Vic was not a particularly successful game sales-wise, I would argue that no other game has had such an influence on their other games. people have been clamouring for Vic's internal gameplay in their other titles, in particular POPS.