3.10 after 3.9 ..im pretty sure thats not math

[Sonat]

lol

[ddr]

Well, I think you'll see even 3.15 :)

[Sonat]

love u <3. tag me when you realize

[Sir Pencil]

I believe they are using a [major.minor(revision)] software versioning style, in which it is entirely possible to see 1.0, 1.1, 1.10, as well as 1.1a, 1.1b, etc. It's not a matter of math so much as it is change tracking.

tag me when you realize, lel

[McGuffin]

you mean... '10' is not coming after '9'?
really ? ;)

(yeah a version number is not a decimal number)

[Roucous]

3.10 after 3.09 not 3.9

[McGuffin]

Originally posted by Roucous:

3.10 after 3.09 not 3.9

quoting myself:
a version number is not a decimal number

you can have 3.9b or 3.9.1 also... the period is not a decimal separator in that case.

[Metul Burr]

3.10 after 3.9 ..im pretty sure thats not math

major.minor.patch
Each element is incremented numerically

Its not math decimal, its counting separated by decimals, and each one is a separate element.

http://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html

You can think of it more like a clock than math. And when the number gets to 13/60 to increment the element before it (as in a clock), the number before it increments, and the numbers after it reset to 0. However in semantic versioning, this doesnt magically happen when the numbers reach 13/60 like in a clock.....but whenever the devs decide it is time. Its different for each program.

Here is another example
https://www.python.org/doc/versions/
in this case look at python 2.7.10 and what precedes it

[Sonat]

oh god. you cant say 3.10 after 3.9. its elementary math. 3.10 is equal to 3.1 man. it should be 3.9.1 or 3.91 Lol
tag me when you realize einstein

[Sonat]

some guys still trying to defend it. lol just admit it it was a mistake. a very shamefullone :)))

[Brigand231]

It's not math. It's industry practice.

[Sonat]

Originally posted by Brigand231:

It's not math. It's industry practice.

it is math. all number is math. industry could use math. its not relevant

[Brigand231]

Originally posted by Wonka:

Originally posted by Brigand231:

It's not math. It's industry practice.

it is math. all number is math. industry could use math. its not relevant

You seriously want to have this argument? Numbers are simply characters that can mean anything the user wishes them to. Take for example, algebra, with its use of variables. A, B, and C are letters when one considers language, but in a mathematical sense they are also numbers and have numerical value. Oh wait, it's not math, it's language. No. Numbers and letters are merely symbols. Their value is set by the user.

You're welcome to continue to read it wrong. Spreading misinformation and trolling is not appreciated.

[Ichzilla]

um actually 3.9 does indeed equal the same as 3.10 so it is math..
3.9 = 00110011 00101110 00111001
3.10 = 00110011 00101110 00110001 00110000

its just adds a few extra points still its all relative....

[Radio]

all of yall getalife k

[Radio]

nobody that has a life cares it's math go back to cod ?