Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The solution I stumbled into is......a sequence of numbers, starting at 1 and progressing higher (the arrow) to 13....with the second blank given to us as a 3. Working up from the bottom, every two consecutive positions, when added together, equal the number in the next higher position.
So, since the lowest number is a 1, then a blank, with the next position given as a 3, the missing number in between has to be a 2. So, above the 3 it has to be a 5 (the two lower positions are 3 and 2).
Keep this up and you end up with 1,2,3,5,8,13.
An easy explanation is here
https://www.mathsisfun.com/numbers/fibonacci-sequence.html
There are supposed to be two 'I' at the beginning:
1,1,2,3,5,8,13.
With a 0 at the start afaik (0+1=1)
No.
The puzzle is purely guesswork and there were no clues whatsoever until you reach the clue that the last box is 8.
--------->
(1) X 3 X X (13)
The most you'd be able to guess is that the numbers are constantly increasing based on the arrow. From there, if you don't explicitly know and recognize the sequence, you will not solve it until the final hint.
The correct way to implement the hints would have been placing a clue that it's a special sequence ("0, 1, 1" instead of just the "1"). Instead of a straight arrow up, a spiral might have clued in people who know it, or carving in a + above the box with a 3 to clue in people who don't know it
YES! This is totally what threw me. Can't fit the pattern if it's not the right pattern. Fibonacci is about the first thing I thought of but it doesn't fit so I discarded.