Why William Afton is Pink Guy & The Killer, Why Michael Afton is Purple Guy, Who you Play As in SL, AND Why He's Innocent

[BeetleDude]

First off, let's get started with how William Afton is the Pink Guy and The Killer
(WARNING, CONTAIN MAJOR SPOILERS FROM BOTH BOOK AND SL, IF YOU HAVEN'T FINISHED BOTH ENDINGS AND BEATEN CUSTOM NIGHT, OR FINISHED BOOK, FINISH THEM THEN COME BACK!)

Exhibit A
In the FNaF 2 minigame with the child crying outside the door of what is presumed to be Fredbear's Family Diner, we see a PINK man drive up in a car, step out, and murder the child. (A lot of people have assumed he becomes the Marionette but I think Sammy from the book does, and this child I know is gonna be a bad theory, but becomes Shadow BB)

Exhibit B
In the "Foxy Go, Go, Go" minigame, we see a PINK guy standing at Pirate's Cove who is smiling at either Foxy for liking him, or an evil smile since he just killed those 5 kids.

And now, why Michael is Purple Guy and is Innocent!

Exhibit A
We've always thought Pink Guy and Purple Guy were one in the same, but Pink Guy is the one we see kill kids, and in the minigames, we never actually see PURPLE Guy commit any crimes! All we see him do is free the souls of the children inside the original 4 and help an employee inside a suit

Exhibit B
In FNaF 3, we see Purple Guy become Springtrap, and Ennard is the one puked out of Purple Guy AFTER we get scooped and Ennard enters us. And in the Custom Night ending, we see Michael/Springtrap say "Father (William Afton), IT'S ME, Michael." proving Michael is the one inside Springtrap and he's purple guy, while Afton/Pink Guy is out there somewhere.

[Lord Egg]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από jsjmbloom:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Kat-Kun:

Shadow BB...?
Is there something huge that I'm missing?!

In the mobile version of FNaF 2, there's an EXTREMELY rare Shadow BB easter egg

That was fake

[Lord Egg]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από bordanka:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Kat-Kun:

http://freddy-fazbears-pizza.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:549427
In this thread, Arts-waifu (6th comment) points out things in it that scream "FAKE!".

Shadow BB is a thing. Look at Mangle's minigame in FNaF 3

More of a crying bb

[FireBoy2221]

It's like that thread a guy made, "I think the killer is someone else.".

[BeetleDude]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Jezza/Erron:

While I agree with Michael being the Purple Guy and all, I have some problems:
1). He becomes The Puppet due to the ironic jumpscare that follows his death and the tear lines. SHADOW BB?! REALLY?! At what point has there been a Shadow BB? And Sammy may be The Puppet in the book but for the last damn time, THE BOOK ISN'T CANON. IT CAN'T BE USED AS EVIDENCE

2). Purple Guy isn't exactly innocent, we see him next to blood and dead kids in the Save Them minigame.

3). Michael didn't free the souls of the children, WE (the player) did. And we freed five souls, not four.

For the last time. He didn't say it's not canon! He said its canon, but not everything is canon, that doesn't mean the WHOLE THING isn't canon!

[Dani]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από jsjmbloom:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Jezza/Erron:

While I agree with Michael being the Purple Guy and all, I have some problems:
1). He becomes The Puppet due to the ironic jumpscare that follows his death and the tear lines. SHADOW BB?! REALLY?! At what point has there been a Shadow BB? And Sammy may be The Puppet in the book but for the last damn time, THE BOOK ISN'T CANON. IT CAN'T BE USED AS EVIDENCE

2). Purple Guy isn't exactly innocent, we see him next to blood and dead kids in the Save Them minigame.

3). Michael didn't free the souls of the children, WE (the player) did. And we freed five souls, not four.

For the last time. He didn't say it's not canon! He said its canon, but not everything is canon, that doesn't mean the WHOLE THING isn't canon!

It's canon to the FNaF universe, but has it's own characters and timeline.
The only character in the book to appear in the games is William.

[RippoMadness]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από jsjmbloom:

For the last time. He didn't say it's not canon! He said its canon, but not everything is canon, that doesn't mean the WHOLE THING isn't canon!

The book does not emcompass the games' story. It is a simple adaptation of that story. Meaning that it's not 100% accurate of said story. Ergo, nothing can be derived from the book as evidence. It was never meant to fill gaps in the story and shouldn't be used to fill gaps in the story. SL does not change that.

[RippoMadness]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Jezza/Erron:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από RippoMadness:

The book does not emcompass the games' story. It is a simple adaptation of that story. Meaning that it's not 100% of said story. Ergo, nothing can be derived from the book as evidence. It was never meant to fill gaps in the story and shouldn't be used to fill gaps in the story. SL does not change that.

About time you commented. 😧

Meh, got tired of debating for a while. Felt like making an exception this one time.

[Dani]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από RippoMadness:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από jsjmbloom:

For the last time. He didn't say it's not canon! He said its canon, but not everything is canon, that doesn't mean the WHOLE THING isn't canon!

The book does not emcompass the games' story. It is a simple adaptation of that story. Meaning that it's not 100% of said story. Ergo, nothing can be derived from the book as evidence. It was never meant to fill gaps in the story and shouldn't be used to fill gaps in the story. SL does not change that.

+

[gabez]

Pink Guy is a myth made by MatPat
It's Purple Guy, just changed because he would blend with the curtains of pirate cove :P

[gabez]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Jezza/Erron:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από NootmaresAreReal m8 ( Back BOI ):

Pink Guy is a myth made by MatPat
It's Purple Guy, just changed because he would blend with the curtains of pirate cove :P

MatPat in NONE of his FNaF theories has mentioned Pink Guy at ANY point. I've watched them enough times to know. The only time is what bought up to him was in livestreams, even then he didn't show much interest in it.

Okay, but my second point has some reason :P

[gabez]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Jezza/Erron:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από NootmaresAreReal m8 ( Back BOI ):

Okay, but my second point has some reason :P

That's just ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ stupid.

Where's your ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ proof that scott did that for another reason?
Do the papers in FNAF 1 mention 2 murderers?

[Dani]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από NootmaresAreReal m8 ( Back BOI ):

Do the papers in FNAF 1 mention 2 murderers?

There's only one murderer.