F.Lolbit is a guy!? (edit: or maybe not)

[Blixy]

F.Lolbit didn't should up on Girl's night. I think it's to balance out girl's night. could be gender-less also, but yeah. if this is true, personally :(. I wish Lolbit was a girl.

(edit)
Then again, F.Lolbit appeared in SL before costum night(which is uncanon). F.Lolbit could still be a she.

(edit 2)
Or the opposite/same gender of F.Foxy which is up in the air.

[Dayvon64]

Superverse a écrit :

Dayvon64 a écrit :

Pull up a chair my friend, let me tell you why any animatronic can not be transgender. Unless they themselves feel as if they are born into the wrong "animatronic" body and thus feel they are the opposite gender, also I'd like to point out transgender has to do with sexual orientation. They can not be transgender, you are assuming that since some look like females to you, that if they are in fact labeled as male, if confirmed by scott, they are transgendered. Animatronics can not have sex changes, they do not have minds that tell them they are in the wrong gender body, and again they have no gender. Even the ones that Scott confirmed do not have gender. There is implied gender however and I am shocked you didn't include all the other gender terms, you just stuck with male/female. I have grew up learning these terms and the differences and it's just so horrible that people are just walking all over them. I do not care if you don't care about my feelings, but at least get your facts right.

I was just all the gender types or whatever. I think a animatronic could be trangender in a sense, in soul of the child is a boy, and the character of the animatronic is a girl like toy chica.

What does souls have to do with anything? So you think that the child would just think "well now I am a girl" or "I am staying as a boy". This wouldn't even matter because Scott never highlights the souls of the kids so that's just null and void.

[Blixy]

Plus there cross and such, but if I don't mention a gender doesn't mean i don't know about it. I don't if a character looks like a (*cough* toy bonnie), but is a boy. as scott say it is, and wasn't vague about it.

[Dombro1]

Superverse a écrit :

Dayvon64 a écrit :

I like how most assume gender because of either looks or the name of said animatronic. It really shows how close minded you are. The majority of genders were classified by phone guy in previous installments and although Fun Time Foxy was called both He and She does not mean there needs to be controversy. People though Fun Time Foxy was a female because of the make-up and way it looked, so you are saying that if a guy wears make up, which guys actually do, they are now to be considered a female? Or if a guy is named Sam, Charlie, Lily, or what not they have to be a female? I know a female with a male's name yet she is a female. Just stop with the gender threads because you are making yourself look desperate, closed minded, and down right stupid. If you're so desperate for a gender why don't you create a group or something and take something so insignificant off this forum.

I know physical feature do not dictate the gender, but Scott hasn't said what the character gender that is represented by animatronic is, whether the character is genderless, boy, girl, both, or transgender.

"Both" isn't a gender. And transgender isn't a gender, it's a state where you are a different gender than you started. Basically, there are only 2 genders

[Metbert]

Dayvon64 a écrit :

Superverse a écrit :

I was just all the gender types or whatever. I think a animatronic could be trangender in a sense, in soul of the child is a boy, and the character of the animatronic is a girl like toy chica.

What does souls have to do with anything? So you think that the child would just think "well now I am a girl" or "I am staying as a boy". This wouldn't even matter because Scott never highlights the souls of the kids so that's just null and void.

this message is for everyone not just for you, I put this here to explicit that belong to this conversation.
Can I add my point of view?

Gender are something that don't affect the games.

They affect only the fanmade ... and in the fanmade I can do almost everything... I can do a fanart where Freddy is a woman with 87 kids and the father are the exotic butters, hentai, wars, harry potter , cats and all the other stuff that comes in my mind ... so who cares if is canon or not.

Instead if you want to do the things in a canon way, simply they are robots without genitals so no genders; if you want to use pronouns, use with genderless pronouns and you'll be 100% sure (with the robots I mean).
About the gender of the characters (the costumes) well ... if I make a cosplay of Wonderwoman ... makes me a woman? no! I'll remain a man.

So here the problem is only one: people (not everyone) can't accept or respect other point of view.

[Blixy]

Both meaning male groin part and female groin part, which people done with characters before. transgender, I only use cause I other people spearate to it's own category, some them consider them "it's" (not me). but you're right in the fact there is only two genders.

[Metbert]

Superverse a écrit :

Both meaning penis and vagina, which people done with characters before. transgender, I only use cause I other people spearate to it's own category, some them consider them "it's" (not me). but you're right in the fact there is only two genders.

well in the world at the question "what is the gender of...?" esist 3 answers:
Male, Female and ... the case of the objects... absence of gender ... or genderless if you prefere.

[Lord Egg]

Metbert a écrit :

The Earthdragonninja a écrit :

Where do people get that lolbit is a virus

it's a speculation, it appears on TV and never in its body(even if it has one) ... so for what we saw in the CN seems a computer program or something like that.

Lolbit mask

[Blixy]

Metbert a écrit :

Superverse a écrit :

Both meaning penis and vagina, which people done with characters before. transgender, I only use cause I other people spearate to it's own category, some them consider them "it's" (not me). but you're right in the fact there is only two genders.

well in the world at the question what is the gender of...? esist 3 answers:
Male, Female and ... the case of the objects... absence of gender ... or genderless if you prefere.

Yeah, anyways what makes more frustrated is how Scott doesn't end type of discussions, by people a straight answer and not vague or lose implying something. Whether boy or girl or gender fluid or none. He had power to end this type of thing but hasn't done anything.
Btw I don't funmentaly care if Lolbit is a boy,girl, gender fuild, genderless. though I have my preference though. Just want him say anything direct and concrete about.

[Dayvon64]

Superverse a écrit :

Metbert a écrit :

well in the world at the question what is the gender of...? esist 3 answers:
Male, Female and ... the case of the objects... absence of gender ... or genderless if you prefere.

Yeah, anyways what makes more frustrated is how Scott doesn't end type of discussions, by people a straight answer and not vague or lose implying something. Whether boy or girl or gender fluid or none. He had power to end this type of thing but hasn't done anything.
Btw I don't funmentaly care if Lolbit is a boy,girl, gender fuild, genderless. though I have my preference though. Just want him say anything direct and concrete about.

I think he was hoping people would be mature enough not to be bothered by something that doesn't matter and not post pointless topics about them in forums. He was sadly wrong.

[gabez]

in that case
Funtime Foxy is a yes
so
Funtime Lolbit is a no

[apollo]

does it really matter.

[Lord Egg]

StanasAreReal m8 a écrit :

in that case
Funtime Foxy is a yes
so
Funtime Lolbit is a no

Mangle is a yes
Funtime foxy is a no
Lolbit is a mabye

[gabez]

The Earthdragonninja a écrit :

StanasAreReal m8 a écrit :

in that case
Funtime Foxy is a yes
so
Funtime Lolbit is a no

Mangle is a yes
Funtime foxy is a no
Lolbit is a mabye

dere we go c:
I hate how everyone argues over it when it's so simple :3

[Metbert]

Dayvon64 a écrit :

Superverse a écrit :

Yeah, anyways what makes more frustrated is how Scott doesn't end type of discussions, by people a straight answer and not vague or lose implying something. Whether boy or girl or gender fluid or none. He had power to end this type of thing but hasn't done anything.
Btw I don't funmentaly care if Lolbit is a boy,girl, gender fuild, genderless. though I have my preference though. Just want him say anything direct and concrete about.

I think he was hoping people would be mature enough not to be bothered by something that doesn't matter and not post pointless topics about them in forums. He was sadly wrong.

I think that his intention are simple, don't reveal them because people have to learn how to respect other opinions.

Anyway my opinion ;)

[Blixy]

Dayvon64 a écrit :

Superverse a écrit :

Yeah, anyways what makes more frustrated is how Scott doesn't end type of discussions, by people a straight answer and not vague or lose implying something. Whether boy or girl or gender fluid or none. He had power to end this type of thing but hasn't done anything.
Btw I don't funmentaly care if Lolbit is a boy,girl, gender fuild, genderless. though I have my preference though. Just want him say anything direct and concrete about.

I think he was hoping people would be mature enough not to be bothered by something that doesn't matter and not post pointless topics about them in forums. He was sadly wrong.

I think I did this whole forum, because I was angry about people it's just a robot thing which I wasn't refering to. But in the end I don't care, I usually don't what people think about gender in general. Well, I did because I love Lolbit's design and stuff and wanted it to be girl that got all defensive. I understand Scott maybe intending to be mature it, but there is a kids in this fandom, some are child at heart, some are defensive like me, and there has been so much conflict that seriously don't why he didn't ended this.