Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Always a pleasure, FNAF has become my escape given the recent political atmosphere. I swear I can't go 10 minutes without getting news about something abhorrent that someone is saying about something and having a gaggle (Or whatever the collective noun for a group of scholars is) of colleagues trying to get my input of how right they are for being outraged.
It's a bit of a sad turn of affairs to have to resort to the internet to get AWAY from flame wars... But I digress...
...
I do have to point out that we may all think we know who the killer is, but I still disagree with the consensus of Afton as being the killer.
Regardless, it could work. I'd be a bit concerned that it would turn into The Silver Eyes of film. knowing Cawthon is heading the movie, I think he's getting more clot then he had with the book deal. I hope he can stand his ground this time around and utilize a proper Villain. Afton makes little sense as the Missing child Killer, from a narrative perspective.
And don't get me started on Micheal Afton. I was not made aware that randomly guessing Afton's offspring was a required tactic in deducting the lore of FNAF Classic.