Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Eggs Benedict.
Scott states that the book is canon, but he also said that it's not meant to splve the lore. These two statements contradict one another (it makes me question Scott's understanding of what canon means all the time). The best way to interpret them and making them both true is by making the book a separate continuity from the games. The novel is a simple adaptation of the FNAF story, borrowing certain details from the games but also not being 100% accurate, inherently making it not canon with the games, only the story.
I don't see the relevence of this. Adaptations reuse the names of the characters all the time. SL has no linkage to the book outside of using a single name, which isn't even all that out of the ordinary.
You're wrong.
It doesn't matter who Eggs Benedict is.
Because he will never give you up, never let you down, never gonna run around and desert you, never gonna make you cry, never gonna say goodbye, never gonna tell a lie and hurt you.
let the thread die dammit
Because William is the Purple Guy in that universe, not Michael.