Installer Steam
connexion
|
langue
简体中文 (chinois simplifié)
繁體中文 (chinois traditionnel)
日本語 (japonais)
한국어 (coréen)
ไทย (thaï)
Български (bulgare)
Čeština (tchèque)
Dansk (danois)
Deutsch (allemand)
English (anglais)
Español - España (espagnol castillan)
Español - Latinoamérica (espagnol d'Amérique latine)
Ελληνικά (grec)
Italiano (italien)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonésien)
Magyar (hongrois)
Nederlands (néerlandais)
Norsk (norvégien)
Polski (polonais)
Português (portugais du Portugal)
Português - Brasil (portugais du Brésil)
Română (roumain)
Русский (russe)
Suomi (finnois)
Svenska (suédois)
Türkçe (turc)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamien)
Українська (ukrainien)
Signaler un problème de traduction
The phrase Please understand that we are determined to always improve the experience of players in our games. But at the same time also need to get more players to check out our games. And there are not many ways to do it effectively without knowing if our strategies are working or not. sounds so fake now. How someone that claims to do something for their customer, employ such a strategy. I can assure you, your strategies are not working for this very reason. If you think your business is more important than your customers, then you don't deserve a business.
Now you'll be known as Daylight Studios the anticonsumer company instead of a developer, and that's is well earned. It's a miracle that Valve haven't banned you.
I'll be wary of you and your product in the future as you showed that you cannot be trusted.
http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2018/06/19/16-studios-removing-alleged-spyware-from-pc-games-after-fan-outcry
DON'T USE IT.
Spying pieces of ♥♥♥♥ stealing data.
Having said that, accessing browser cookies directly is a bit of a concern - when you visit a website it's not normally able to read cookies from other sites and theroetically that could be abused.
Even if every other company is doing this, does that make it right?I mean if one person breaks into my house and robs me does that mean anyone else is justified to do the same? Also just because something isn't illegal, doesn't mean it's right or that anyone doing thesaid actions should be excused from blame for doing so.
Yes, anti-consumer practices are not rare in the field of computer software, companies have long known they can abuse their customer base and have only a slim chance of ever being busted for it, and since these companies tend to view their customer base of stupid sheep waiting to be sheered it doesn't surprise me when things like this come out, but it also doesn't stop me from calling out those using these tactics against their own consumers.
We constantly hear how the purchase price of games isn't high enough, which is why they need paid dlc, loot boxes, pushing in game stores, branding deals with various companies, with no mention of this revenue stream. I've got no problem with greed, but Jesus people, let's try and keep it to sane levels shall we?
- Using an MS operating system
- Using any social media application
- Just browsing the web with JS/cookies enabled (check how many pages have Facebook scripts running, it's insane)
- Using a credit card
If we give this company the benefit of the doubt that they're just collecting anonymised info related to specific games - ethically maybe there's a degree of wrongdoing there but practically speaking? There's a lot worse that goes on, so I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do think there should be a EULA *specific* to this Red-Shell software library that users have to accept (don't know if there was or not) - the (more intrusive) anti-cheat systems do at least present such a EULA (I won't play Fortnite because of this but giving admin-level access to a piece of background software running all the time is quite a big deal).
If all is above-board then compared to Google and Facebook this is nothing. If the people who are upset here are all Libertarian Linux users who greatly value their privacy, don't use social media, etc, then fair enough, but otherwise I do kinda think this is a bit of a 'storm in a teacup' in relative terms.
Edit: I hope anyone worried about privacy intrusions avoids VAC protected games btw:
"In February 2014, rumors spread that the system was monitoring websites users had visited by accessing their DNS cache. Gabe Newell responded via Reddit, clarifying that the purpose of the check was to act as a secondary counter-measure to detect kernel level cheats, and that it affected one tenth of one percent of clients checked which resulted in 570 bans."
Sid alpha discusses red shell
This is not a bad game, but it is also not the greatest game ever made. You got paid by the people who bought it, and I dunno why you would think it would be ok to harvest and sell my personal information to make more, but I have no respect for that decision or anyone who would even consider stealing my personal info and selling it to be something ok.
If I bought a box of Cheerios and found a dead scorpion inside I would blame the STORE, not general mills................
Please do better.
Just like ken says what if she poison your drink on the first date...
Would you still go for a second time, after waking up in the hospital just escaped dead?
Everyone so hes own thing but I wouldn't.
It is just the same cheap sht as from facebook...
The big problem we got here is that they force it upon us and that even without saying.
You should watch the video 2 comments above mine, it explains it verry well.
It is not so much about them tracking x data but the fact red shell sells it.
That together with no opt-in or opt-out it seems like facebook all over again true that.
But while we can avoid using credit cards and social media this we can't if we play the game.
Instead of asking us if we ok with them gathering x data which would already change the whole landscape. Still it doesn't take away that RED SHELL is the worst of them all...
That's just stupid. If you found a dead scorpion inside a closed, sealed box of Cheerios then it is definitly General Mills' fault.
Untrue. The wax bag holding the cheerios may be sealed, but stuff gets into cereal boxes all the time. Try Googling "snake in a cereal box" or something like that.......
The point is that I don't blame Red Shell for existing, I blame the devs that allow it into thier games.