Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The combat engines are relatively the same. One big difference is that artillery in UGG have much more strict line of sight restrictions.
Being the older game, the controls and UI aren't quite as good in UGG. Starting with UGCW and then going back is definitely rough.
UGG also has multiplayer which UGCW does not. Player base isn't large, bit it's still usually possible to find a game.
Overall it's hard to recommend over UGCW, but it can still be worth while.
well I am looking for an accessible way for me to get into the UG series. Am I missing Gettyburg campaign with Civil War if I just stick with Civil War?
If Gettyburg map is included in Civil War, then one must wonder if UG: Gettyburg is still relevant nowadays..I don't play MP
It's not so much the tutorials, it's more that, in Gettysburg, there's less to manage. You're given a set army and just have to focus on using it well, rather than having to build, equip and maintain your own forces like you do in the UGCW campaign.
That said, you could always get UGCW and just play the historical battles to begin with while you learn the ropes.