Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There was widespread belief in the 19th Century, especially in the wake of several failed liberal revolutions, that democracy was inherently weak and prone to splintering & infighting. Many Unionists in 1861 saw the struggle as a critical fight for the survival of democracy itself - "the last, best hope" for mankind - while European nations viewed it as a last gasp against the superiority of constitutional monarchy. Just as important to my mind, the war became a de facto crusade against slavery, a stain on the the history & soul of the Republic. Because of these political aspects of the Civil War, I would find playing as the CSA to be distasteful - my only attraction to a CSA campaign is that there are different side battles.
Pretty much this. Personally, I feel it was a mix of slave owners trying to retain their economic significance. They saw abolition as a threat to their livelihoods. Also, many in the south were "Anti-Federalist" which argued that a strong central government invited things such as monarchies and dictatorship and thus were against the spirit of the constitution and the declaration of independance.
The north was far more in favor of a strong central government and, although racism abounded, most (who were not slave owners anyways) were against slavery. In the end, it was rural/higher slave dependant anti federalists vs urban federalists.
There are some great pieces of writing about the political climate that lead to the American Civil War. Most are quite impartial.
Although, I think we can all agree that slavery is bad. mmmk?
On that note, I'm about to start my first confederate campaign. Let's see how it goes!
I do have family on the confederate side. My great x3 grandfather was in the 2nd South Carolina Infantry Regiment. That's about all I know about him unfortanatly.
Personally I like the battles of the CSA campaign better, but I like the artillery selection of the Union. I play both but purely for fun in terms of play-style I like CSA. More offensive based rather than defensive.
I'm going to add that I have very little respect for people who think that playing a role in a computer game equals condoning a political perspective. There are countless reasons of why men fought. The average soldier had little to nothing to do with slavery. The war is over. The Union won. Control thy modern bigory over people long dead.
I don’t think it’s a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ cause of the war thread, I think the original poster wanted more answers like yours. Since it’s a game, I think it’s fine whoever you play as.