Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
2. I've won both on Hard, let alone Easy, having killed more of the enemy than I lost myself. Money is always a problem to get more of, but you get 25% more on Easy. :P
From what I can see, you're just not managing your losses in battles and managing your army well enough.
Im not a noob and have lot of exp also in similar games. I think i understand the mechanics of army or battle management. sorry, its always strange when u have to say this about ur self, because it sounds selfish. Also there a not so much things in UGCW which are hard to learn. Its mostly simple in his battle mechanics, its ok for me, but its defenetly not a very complex system. Playing this game too long to oversee these basics ;-).
I also won these battles, but because of the lack of money and high losses its more efficient to draw these battles with lower losses of manpower and equipment, which u cant compensate with the win-reward. U can win every battle in this game, but it makes no sense when u have lots of pyrrhic wins.Its ok when u face a scenario which was historically a desaster for the playing army and draw is an option, but it doesnt match with the rewards u gain. I mean i was talking about easy mode not hard mode.
(no fixed scale) , I'm at Chickamauga and I have more money and troops than I know what to do with. I've won every battle, managed to do so without having a net loss in either cash or troops.
Investing your career points into politics, economy, medicine and training help a lot if you need to save troops and cash, just get your Recon and Army Org skills up to adequate levels, which you should be able to do after the first few grand battles and if you picked the right traits, and for the rest of the game just invest in those four skills.
Also read the guides, they have a lot of tips to help minimize losses in battle, which saves you cash and troops
Plz dont missunderstood but i think i have to say it clear: Im not an idoit. All things u sayed are true but self-evident basics. I read many guides and played this too long to be so stupid and didnt look for optimizing my tactics and how to invest the career points. I also won these battles, but sometimes decided to draw, because i cant compensate the losses with the win-reward. I also restart some battles to optimize and adapt my tactics and minimize my losses....of course. I win 95% of the battles with a killratio of 2 or 3, sometimes 4to1. and still have these money problems on easy mode. I never had these problem on normal mode.
Army Management.
Never had these problems before. also not at higher difficulties. I still wonder why this happend in easy mode. It doesnt feel like an easy mode. If i was able to finsih it many times, also on normal and hard (but just with union) without having these problem, how can u repeat your imposition? I just facing this money problems on easy since the last patch. maybe theres something wrong or bugged with the new options, thats what i wanna tell the devs. but u only come with arrogancy, so thx for u help and goodbye.
Normally the easy settings on most games are there for the player to explore the game at their own pace without feeling overwhelmed. Unfortunately players jumping into this game for the first time are likely to turn away as there is currently no area of the game to explore their army comp/decisions. Personally I have to go through multiple campaigns just to understand all the different tactics and army comps available. I find myself, all too often, completely starting a campaign over because 1 of my army corps was just slightly too much Arty. and not enough Inf.
To be perfectly clear if easy boils down to building a preset army that was pre-calculated to have the best odds of winning, (e.g. you must have exactly 3 Inf. And 1 arty at bull-run for the rebs. If u decide to make anything ells you lose in the end game because u lost 200 more recruits than usual) then it’s probably best just to go back to total war. Its things like this like this I would expect out of legendary difficulty, not easy. Just make a difficulty that allows the player to explore the game their own way without having perfect tactics or build orders. I’m sure that a lot of people would like to see how an army corps make exclusively out of Arty. would fair at Getty’s burg alongside the rest of their army.
I know it isn’t very popular to say easy should be easier but having a difficulty that allows a jumping off point for new players is necessary to keep interest in this game.
Many people have noticed the problems with running low on money and even equipment, the only suggestion being that as you learn the proper exploits things will go easier, but that doesn't work for a first time player which we are supposed to be mindful of in our repeated tests. Soldier is one of those players that will argue with you without any need to see your point of view, just ignore him and realize that there are many of us that have seen the same thing you reported here and have reported it in other posts as well. Hopefully it is seen by the Devs.
If your input is that they need to make a level beyond easy for people completely new to the genre, then that is good feedback. But you sound like a person that has played some strategy games before and I respectfuly disagree with your motion that Easy mode/ the economic structure of the game is unbalanced and needs to go back to formula.