安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Honestly, the only reason anyone made a stink over the retcon was because it was a CC mod.
Those who were/are outspokenly anti-CC jumped on ANY reason to disparage, invalidate, and insult the content in the hopes of convincing people not to buy it or not to like it. It’s their way of “fighting” against paid mods because they sincerely fear that one day free mods will no longer be a thing.
If the creation had never been made and they brought back Umbra in TESVI with the same half-assed “oh you THOUGHT it was destroyed? Guess again” explanation no one would’ve batted an eye.
You saw the same thing happen with Creations’ initial paid content - which I believe was commissioned as well - specifically the arquebus.
They made a stink over such a weapon being not lore-friendly, and dismissed the very real fact that cannons (historically the precursor to first handheld firearms) have appeared on artwork and 3D models of Redguard ships created by BGS as well as appearing in card artwork in TES: Legends.
Funnily, these are likely the same people who think mods like Glenmoril are great and have no issues using the firearms introduced in it.