Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
You see, i would like to know how i missed the point, the Thread title is literally "Silver Hand - Good or Bad guys".
I actually agree, it feels very rushed, I believe more thought and story line could have gone into the silver hand, and the werewolves, however I guess, it's each to their own. I personally became both werewolf and vampire, but preferred being just plain old Nord. I found it all a little too much to keep on top of keeping "fed" etc, but it was fun.
I'm a pansy though, I play on easy, and enjoy time spent wandering, and side questing, so when the silver hand and werewolves quest lines were a bit rushed it was a shame.
I still love the game though 💓
Wolves do as well. So do regular dogs. Had some animals killed by a wandering coyote some years back too. Bears have a well deserved reputation for being dangerous and grumpy also. Plus not a year goes by where someone doesn't get gored by a buffalo in Yellowstone. Moose can be pretty dangerous too.
This whole topic was developed as a character study in Classic Skyrim as a thread with an ongoing story that progressed over 4 years from 2014 written by Skyrimnut
Straag Rod ...
The Nords are somewhat chill on violence in general. There are Nords entirely chill with their previous king being Shouted apart because a clean fight's a clean fight and while it'd be inappropriate for a regular joe to murder the king, the dragonborn and the king are both people of an elevated class. Not all Nords are this pragmatic, but you get some dialogue that implies even a few detractors of Ulfric take more umbrage with his politics than that specific act.
In view of this, the Silver Hand are somewhat cautious in most of their violence towards the Companions. Luring them out away from crowded places and loading up on weapons designed to kill werewolves suggests they're not really fanatics (they want to succeed, not die), and that they would rather avoid civilian casualties caught up in a werewolf's frenzy. Also, their familiarity with the Wuuthrad stuff is just one of several connections between them and the Companions.
Torture's evil, no doubt about it. As shown by what you find in-game, the Silver Hand does this to anyone it captures, including kids. I repeat, they torture kids. Any organization with does that CANNOT be good; at best, they're going way overboard, and at worse, they're just as evil and savage as they imagine lycanthropes to be.
The reason they do this is because they're out of their minds with paranoia about lycanthropy, and that kind of fear produces fanatics. If they even get an idea that someone in a nearby village MIGHT be infected with lycanthropy, that village get put to the torch. They don't even investigate, as the mere rumor is enough. Because of this fear, they hate the Companions, even though it's only the Circle that are werewolves; most of the Companions are not part of that sub-group.
They are obviously Evil because of how they behave, the fact their enemy may or may not be evil does not affect how evil they themselves are.
It would be like arguing that a group of Yakuza are good guys because they at war with a group of the Mafia.... it doesn't work because both of them are criminal groups who terrorise regular people, the fact they fight each other changes nothing.... (this is hypothetical by the way)
No, i didn't. Here's, bellow, my exactly phrase on Op:
"From my pov, the silver hands are the good guys into a whole and the companions are a complex bunch of characters".
I tend to disagree, because "how they behave" is up for too much assumptions, but it's ok, both sides have shallow evidences to justify them as good or evil. About them being criminals in behavior, that's more on the lazy work of Betsheda than anything else, as stated before.