Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Still, I sided with Kematu most of the time (because there is one playthrough where I am a Thalmor Justiciar) because Saa'dia's story doesn't add up. Hammerfell citizens all despise the Thalmor but she runs because she spoke out against the Aldmeri Dominion? Hammerfell too has kicked pointy-eared booties out of their home last I checked so Saa'dia is more likely the liar. Just my 2 cents.
Hyen says her story doesn't add up, and it doesn't. But when I talked to Kematu parts of his story don't add up either, I can't remember what exactly but it did sound like a cover up on their part as well.
Which brings me back to never knowing who is telling the truth.
EDIT: since I went a bit off topic, I actually agree with the OP most of the time with how I handle the situation--If you bring the Ebony Blade, they both count as a charge, which can be quite handy.
Neither side makes sense from a Thalmor involvement perspective because the Second Treaty of Stros M'Kai was signed 20 years prior to the events of Skyrim.
The time the city in question would have fallen was a whole 29 years prior to the events of Skyrim. Now it is not the easiest to tell the age of a standardized body mesh and skin texture with some facegen tweaking, but Saadia seems to be quite younger than Hulda with her habit of calling her 'mum'. Thus I highly doubt that Saadia is in her late 40s early 50s. Any earlier than that, and Saadia would have literally been a child at the time she 'sold out' the city. Plus, Kematu says "the resistance is alive and well in Hammerfell". This is factually untrue, as the treaty forced the Thalmor to withdraw their occupation, and it really doesn't make sense for the resisyance to send to many elite soldiers on a manhunt in Skyrim if they are still actively clashing with the enemy.
By the same token, the Thalmor are no longer occupying Hammerfell due to the Second treaty of Stros M'Kai, thus it makes no sense for Kematu to be after her to bring her back to the Thalmor (or for the Thalmor to care about the transgression >20 years after the fact) since they aren't officially present in it. It doesn't even make sense that the Thalmor would be hiring the Alik'r if they already have hundreds of agents in Skyrim.
Thus I propose that either the quest was written before the lore was finalized and hence makes no sense, or the conflict in question really has nothing to do with the Thalmor and each side is just hoping you're ignorant enough about history and linear time to help them rather than the other.
If TES VI takes place in Hammerfell I am sure we'll learn anyways.
While I disagrred with your view, you do have a very strong and valid point on both sides and the unrelated Thalmor theory is becoming quite believable. Only time will tell who's right, or not at all.
The true story: Saadia is just a thot who scammed the wrong man.