Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
http://elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/Netch_(Dragonborn)
Edit: BTW, you're well over the armor cap of 567 so you can afford to swap out some armor enchants for shock resistance.
And I've never found the Netch that tough, so something in that combo works.
I've never understood if shock damage from magical attacks are deflected by magical resistance but I typically have 85% Magical Resistance and then I carry a pair of Frost / Fire resistant boots for when I'm dealing with dragons.
I'm able to stand in their concentrated elemental damage without taking significant damage.
OP, If you play as a Breton you get 25% to magic damage resistance by default.
The Lord Stone will give you another 20%. The Agent of Mara another 15% which is very easy to get. And putting 2 pts in Magic Resistance under the Alteration skill tree will add another 20%. This gives you 85% magic resistance which is the max I believe.
But someone said on another thread, about hree weeks ago, that the game views destruction spells as Elemental damage rather than magic resistance, and magic resistance is used to resist spells from the illusion school and the like. I never got around to testing it, since I'm playing another game at the minute, so I don't know if they are right.
I should have been more clear. What I think to be the case is that if you have 85% magic resist then you are capped and the damage you receive from elemental magic spells like frost, fire and shock is reduced by 85%.
But if you have specific Frost, Fire, Shock resistance then the remaining 15% of damage you receive from these will be reduced.
This is why in addition to the 85% magic resistance I carry the Fire / Frost boots for dealing with dragons. It is to mitigate the actual damage I take under the additiona 15%.
I'm not sure if that is right and I've seen no definitive statement. But like I said, I take very little fire or frost damage from dragons when properly equipped.
Here is an example of what I am talking about. This guy has a similar build as regards to magic and fire resistance. Notice the damage he takes while standing in full Elder Dragon fire.
That is similar to what I experience on Legendary difficulty.
https://youtu.be/ixP46SVS9Fo?t=388
I never bothered doing the maths, I just tried stuff and saw what worked and what didn't.
But what you say makes sense, so quite possibly.
Well take what I've said with a grain of salt because I'm not sure. I'm not sure if it is possible to have 85% Magic Resistance + 85% Fire Resistance either. But presumably if what I think to be true one could stand in a fire stream which delivers 100 dps and take:
100 less 85% less 85% which is 2.25 dps.
But all of this is contengent upon the fire damage being the result of a magic spell as opposed to simply standing in naturally occuring flames. I think.
Did you literally pull that example from the wiki explaining how it works and then ask if that's how it works?
Resist Magic is factored independently of Resist Fire, Resist Frost, and Resist Shock effects, meaning elemental resistance is factored after Magic Resistance has been applied. A 100-point Fire spell would deal only 15 damage with full Magic Resistance, and Fire Resistance can reduce that 15 points by 85%, down to 2.25 points for 97.75% total resistance.[en.uesp.net]
Nope. I have this niffty tool on my computer called "calculator." You can plug numbers into it and retrieve the results of arithmetic calculations.
Well, instead of using a calculator you could always check the wiki instead. Takes less steps.
Well I didn't consider this specific calculation to be overly burdensome given the availability of said calculator.
But I do appreciate you linking that particular wiki. The one I have been using is less clear on the subject.