Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Different more efficient compression methods.
It's less than 1GBs difference. Not really all that surprising.
Beyond that, the changes they made to most of the textures seem to consist of nothing more than opening them in Photoshop, applying a sharpen filter, and then saving. Which actually causes them to look worse in some instances, but that's really beyond the point. The point is they're essentially the same size textures (size here meaning pixel data, not file size).
Everything else they did involves code changes and the addition of various lighting changes. The same way ENB is less than 10mbs, so too are the changes made to Skyrim with SSE.
Don't know how I didn't just automatically assume it was from better file compression, thanks.
that's what I was thinking but I'm not sure, the prompt to install the original version said it was 13.3 gb, and I thought I remembered having to start downloading the dlcs and hd pack after the main game installed the last time i downloaded skyrim.