Forsworn RP?

[Nova]

I'm using mods and making a forsworn character, but aside from the forsworn related quests, and (for my character, anyway) Hircines quest, I'm not really sure what I should do? Any ways to rationalize a forsworn doing other questlines like the dark brotherhood? Open to ideas.

[GrimCat]

You are an agent of the Forsworn. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to infiltrate the various factions of Skyrim. This will ensure that they're under our controll when the time of the uprising is nigh!

[Southpawe]

Being an assassin would help destabilize Skyrim allowing for easier Forsworn take over.

Same for joining Stormcloaks. The Empire/Thalmor would be much more likely to hunt down the Forsworn.

Mage college could be you learning how to be a shaman if nobody in your tribe was able to teach you.

Companions quest would make no sense.

Thievesguild would make no sense

[MysticMalevolence]

Though the companions questline makes no sense, the end goal of becoming a werewolf does.

[Nova]

Originally posted by Southpawe:

Being an assassin would help destabilize Skyrim allowing for easier Forsworn take over.

Same for joining Stormcloaks. The Empire/Thalmor would be much more likely to hunt down the Forsworn.

Mage college could be you learning how to be a shaman if nobody in your tribe was able to teach you.

Companions quest would make no sense.

Thievesguild would make no sense

I don't think any Forsworn would ever join the stormcloaks. I don't really see them joining either side, but for sure not the stormcloaks.

[SpeedFreak1972]

yea don't forget Ullfrics history with the Forsworn

[alexander_dougherty]

Originally posted by Shredder:

I'm using mods and making a forsworn character, but aside from the forsworn related quests, and (for my character, anyway) Hircines quest, I'm not really sure what I should do? Any ways to rationalize a forsworn doing other questlines like the dark brotherhood? Open to ideas.

Forsworn are basically Bretons whose ancestors were corrupted by dark magics, play ESO for details, and who are still playing around with corrupting influences, so doing missions for Sithis isn't that much of a stretch.

[MysticMalevolence]

Originally posted by Shredder:

Originally posted by Southpawe:

Being an assassin would help destabilize Skyrim allowing for easier Forsworn take over.

Same for joining Stormcloaks. The Empire/Thalmor would be much more likely to hunt down the Forsworn.

Mage college could be you learning how to be a shaman if nobody in your tribe was able to teach you.

Companions quest would make no sense.

Thievesguild would make no sense

I don't think any Forsworn would ever join the stormcloaks. I don't really see them joining either side, but for sure not the stormcloaks.

Yeah, there's an imperial propaganda piece about the forsworn being misunderstood and Ulfric being the worst (The Bear of Markarth I believe) so more likely they'd be with the Imperials.
Ulfric and the Silver-Bloods have no intention of supporting the Forsworn claim.

[Perplex]

Originally posted by Southpawe:

Companions quest would make no sense.

Thievesguild would make no sense

Companion to get more power? be better at fighting.

Thieves guild same as Brotherhood, destabilsation. The more people misstrust each other the easier it is to take over or start a revolution.

[alexander_dougherty]

Originally posted by Perplex:

Originally posted by Southpawe:

Companions quest would make no sense.

Thievesguild would make no sense

Thieves guild same as Brotherhood, destabilsation. The more people misstrust each other the easier it is to take over or start a revolution.

except you are stabilising the thieves guild, which in turn stabilises the criminals, and makes the situation less likely to lead to a revolution......

[Perplex]

Originally posted by alexander_dougherty:

Originally posted by Perplex:

Thieves guild same as Brotherhood, destabilsation. The more people misstrust each other the easier it is to take over or start a revolution.

except you are stabilising the thieves guild, which in turn stabilises the criminals, and makes the situation less likely to lead to a revolution......

The more organised an organisation is the better it is. If you listen to what people say in game the thieves are not an issue untill you finnish some quest to make them better organised and get a fothold in different holds, then they become an issue with the population in the holds.

[alexander_dougherty]

Originally posted by Perplex:

Originally posted by alexander_dougherty:

except you are stabilising the thieves guild, which in turn stabilises the criminals, and makes the situation less likely to lead to a revolution......

The more organised an organisation is the better it is. If you listen to what people say in game the thieves are not an issue untill you finnish some quest to make them better organised and get a fothold in different holds, then they become an issue with the population in the holds.

But the thieves in the guild are not killing, were as if the situation was more unstable they would become bandits, who kill civilians, and thus destabilise areas more.

For the forsworn the thieves guild would only make sense if you were inserting more forsworn into the thieves guild, especially if it was cover for more revolutionary activities.

[Perplex]

Originally posted by alexander_dougherty:

Originally posted by Perplex:

The more organised an organisation is the better it is. If you listen to what people say in game the thieves are not an issue untill you finnish some quest to make them better organised and get a fothold in different holds, then they become an issue with the population in the holds.

But the thieves in the guild are not killing, were as if the situation was more unstable they would become bandits, who kill civilians, and thus destabilise areas more.

For the forsworn the thieves guild would only make sense if you were inserting more forsworn into the thieves guild, especially if it was cover for more revolutionary activities.

No they are not killing, they are causing misstrust instead. The forsworn in Markarth do not kill people either, they spy and cause internal markarth politic problems instead.

[GrimCat]

Even the Forsworn are going to need operating funds if they plan to revolt. Having the thieves guild in your pocket would help towards that end.

[DerRitter]

Originally posted by Perplex:

Originally posted by alexander_dougherty:

But the thieves in the guild are not killing, were as if the situation was more unstable they would become bandits, who kill civilians, and thus destabilise areas more.

For the forsworn the thieves guild would only make sense if you were inserting more forsworn into the thieves guild, especially if it was cover for more revolutionary activities.

No they are not killing, they are causing misstrust instead. The forsworn in Markarth do not kill people either, they spy and cause internal markarth politic problems instead.

What? Forsworn are a bunch of bandits and terrorists "not killing"..... Tell that to the countless travelers murdered on the roads through the hills

[Perplex]

Originally posted by DerRitter:

Originally posted by Perplex:

No they are not killing, they are causing misstrust instead. The forsworn in Markarth do not kill people either, they spy and cause internal markarth politic problems instead.

What? Forsworn are a bunch of bandits and terrorists "not killing"..... Tell that to the countless travelers murdered on the roads through the hills

The thieves guild is not killing.